Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Burns is back in pads at practice


JawnyBlaze
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, tukafan21 said:

People really need to stop comparing a potential Burns deal to deals signed a year or two ago.

It's not hard to understand, every off season the next batch of elite players at a position pass by the previous high contracts.  It's the reason Mahomes is like the 10th highest paid QB after he was the Top guy the second he signed his deal a few years ago.

I guarantee there will be no less than 5-6 players in the next 2 years that will sign bigger deals than whatever we give Burns, plus the couple guys who would still have bigger deals than him right now.

If I were to tell you that in 2 years, we'd have Burns locked up for another 4 years while being paid in the 10-12th highest paid lineman/pass rusher in the league, is there anyone who wouldn't be thrilled about that?

Stop looking at the moment and look at the bigger picture.

I fully understand this concept and even alluded to it in my post, but it really only applies directly with players in the same tier, Burns is a tier below those other guys at the top of the market. At least I see him as a tier below, maybe the Panthers will cave and the league sees him in the same tier but I'm skeptical of that. 25-26 per year makes sense and I would bet that is what he winds up getting if we extend him now. 

IF he plays the year out here in a 3-4 and dominates in the scheme change (very possible) then I may elevate him to that top tier and he can reset the market but that has yet to happen and is just projecting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, CRA said:

Well, given we drafted Bryce Young and have to develop him.  Which is what the next 1-3 years will really be about.   I’d prefer Moore.  My answer probably would depend where my team was. 

We hit a legit true rebuild window.  Burns was essentially the one move running counter to it. 


Fit said they offered CHI more picks but they would only do the deal if they could get a player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

Or, you get two Everette Browns. 

Sure...but if you constantly view draft picks through the lens of "worst case scenario", then we just traded up to first overall to draft JaMarcus Russell.  And there's no point in even retaining first round picks, we might as well trade them every year for known commodities.  But the reality is, high draft picks are among the most valuable assets you can have in the NFL, and there's a reason for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, t96 said:

I fully understand this concept and even alluded to it in my post, but it really only applies directly with players in the same tier, Burns is a tier below those other guys at the top of the market. At least I see him as a tier below, maybe the Panthers will cave and the league sees him in the same tier but I'm skeptical of that. 25-26 per year makes sense and I would bet that is what he winds up getting if we extend him now. 

IF he plays the year out here in a 3-4 and dominates in the scheme change (very possible) then I may elevate him to that top tier and he can reset the market but that has yet to happen and is just projecting. 

I think the whole tier system is also a fallacy

Elite players don't grow on trees, this isn't like an accountant, where if the person you want is asking for too much money, you can easily pass on him and go out and get someone equally as good for less money.  You don't pay a player because of what they're worth, you pay a player because of what they're worth to another team because you have to beat them out on contract offers.

If Burns were an unrestricted FA right now, he'd easily get a contract over $25 million and probably pushing $30, because another team in need of pass rushing would give it to him as you have to overpay to get players of his talent.

So in essence, you're never paying the player for what they're worth, you're paying what it takes to keep the player from going to another team, and once you look at it like that, you can't look at players in terms of tiers of elite status or even what others have been paid.

You can see the same thing in reverse right now for RB's.  There were a ton of RBs on the market this year, which is why they struggled to get good contracts, because if a team passed on an RB, there were a plethora of other options out there, which isn't the case with top end pass rushers.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, therealmjl said:

I mean you interpret it how you want. He's isolated himself from the team during the stretching period, spent a good portion of the practice in the medical tent getting wrapped up, and didn't participate in any team activities. 

 

 

You call it practicing, I call it avoiding a fine.

The tweets about him not taking part were from the early portion of practice where it's just stretching and conditioning. Once the actual practice drill started, he joined in.

Whether he took part in scrimmages and such won't be noted until later because that portion of practice is closed to reporters.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

The tweets about him not taking part were from the early portion of practice where it's just stretching and conditioning. Once the actual practice drill started, he joined in.

Whether he took part in scrimmages and such won't be noted until later because that portion of practice is closed to reporters.

 

If by the "actual practice drills" you mean individual non-contact drills - sure.

Edited by therealmjl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The tweets about him not taking part were from the early portion of practice where it's just stretching and conditioning. Once the actual practice drill started, he joined in.

Whether he took part in scrimmages and such won't be noted until later because that portion of practice is closed to reporters.

 

He was a full participant otherwise they'd have to list his as limited. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ricky Prickles said:

I saw online that he supposedly wants 27-28 million per year and I think they said Panthers are at 23-24 million. Do you think they settle at 25-26 per year?

I think it will be $25m with incentive bonuses to escalate the contract6 to $27m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...