Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Burns is back in pads at practice


JawnyBlaze
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

It doesn't have anything to do with him being injured.

Reporting changed a few years ago from questionable, doubtful and such to "did not practice, limited participation" etc.

If he doesn't take part in practice, that's where it will show up.

got it, but I thought they changed the rule couple years back that stopped this in order for coaches to not use it to their advantage, with Bill b being a prime example

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

That literally says he took part in individual padded drills. So he is really participating, just not in everything yet. 

I mean you interpret it how you want. He's isolated himself from the team during the stretching period, spent a good portion of the practice in the medical tent getting wrapped up, and didn't participate in any team activities. 

 

 

You call it practicing, I call it avoiding a fine.

 

Edited by therealmjl
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

I would guess Bosa waits on Burns’ deal since everyone knows Bosa’s should be the highest, and he’ll get like 1mil more

If Bosa is only getting 1 mill more than Burns…..that will tell you Bosa got screwed or Carolina got screwed.  Burns and Bosa aren’t the same. 

part of the board has always rooted for overpaying and bad contracts.  Then bitch at Hurney or whoever for doing what they begged for a couple years later 

  • Pie 5
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't get the Hunter hate. Just imagine his ceiling if he stopped trying to be this 2way freak and focused on one side of the ball 
    • 100%.  You have to play the cards that are dealt.  Not the cards you wish were dealt.
    • I'd say its definitely going to be addressed this off-season.  We went into the last draft with a roster of RBs including:  Chubba, Blackshear, and Miles Sanders. We picked Jonathan Brooks in the second and still signed Rashaad Penny afterwards.  Fast forward....One turned into a top 10 back, 1 is injured/out for most if not all the '25 season, 1 retired, 1 will either take a huge paycut or be cut, and the last is a restricted free agent. We brought in Mike Boone as well. Add him to the free agent list also.  We need a physical option.    Which qualifies:  Ashton Jeanty(Boise St): Overall ranked Top 10. Almost 2k yards after contact, 28 tds. Would take our first rounder. My money would be on an NFC East team selecting him. (97.2 PFF run grade) - 121 forced missed tackles.  Omarion Hampton(UNC): Ranked everywhere from 20 - 59 overall. Consensus #2 back after Jeanty. He'll be a second rounder. 1,222 Yards after contact w/ 15 tds.  (90.5 PFF run grade) - 72 forced missed Tackles Kaleb Johnson(Iowa): Ranked from 38 - 69 depending on which media outlet you prefer but generally #3. 2nd/3rd possibly. 1,060 Yards after contact w/ 21 tds.(86.7 PFF run grade)- 66 forced missed tackles Cam Skattebo: Ranked from the 50's - 104. Every mock I do he ends up BPA at some point. 969 Yards after contact w/ 17 tds(92 PFF Run Grade). Probably the best receiving back of the group. 81 forced missed tackles.  If the '24 and '25 draft classes were combined, IMO the rankings would be, in order: Jeanty, Hampton, Brooks, Johnson, Skattebo. I wouldn't take one high but I'd take one for Chubba and Brooks insurance. 
×
×
  • Create New...