Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

USATODAY record predictions


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

I would be okay with 7-10 if we are trending up in the second half of the season and Bryce looks like he is definitely the man. I predict both of those things happen. Expecting much more than 7-10 is not wise with so many brand-new pieces. It may happen, but it would be an over-achievement IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't fault their prediction seeing as how we looked in the preseason and with all new staff and young QB and many new players etc. The Falcons are going to be improved I think and trending upward but not sure if they go 9-8 myself. Who knows but will be interesting to see how the Panthers play and how we hopefully improve as the season moves forward 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, t96 said:

That is outrageously bad…

Chiefs have only had 1 season 10-7 or worse (9-7) and it was with Alex Smith early in their rebuild under Reid, never have had under 12 wins with Mahomes as starter, that’s not changing this year.

 

AFCN is not going to have 4 10+ win teams… There are 12 guaranteed losses (assuming no ties) in the division, so they have across the 4 teams only 12 losses to non-Division teams all year (average 3 per team or an average record of 8-3 outside the division… yeah right)

 

no reason Cowboys and Vikings will drop off that much, Falcons aren’t making the playoffs, Cards and Raiders will not be that bad. Woof

I agreed with everything until you said the cardinals won't be that bad.  They might be the first team in the NFL to have less then 0 wins.  Their coach is a joke and their roster is dog poo 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CBS predictions:

NFC South
1. *Saints: 10-7
2. *Falcons: 9-8
3. Buccaneers: 7-10
4. Panthers: 6-11

NFC West
1. *49ers: 12-5
2. Seahawks: 8-9
3. Rams: 5-12
4. Cardinals: 3-14

NFC North
1. *Vikings: 9-8
2. *Lions: 9-8
3. Packers: 7-10
4. Bears: 6-11

NFC East
1. *Cowboys: 12-5
2. *Eagles: 12-5
3. Giants: 8-9
4. Commanders: 7-10

AFC West
1. *Chiefs: 12-5 
2. Chargers: 9-8
3. Broncos: 8-9
4. Raiders: 6-11

AFC South
1. *Titans: 9-8
2. Jaguars: 8-9 
3. Colts: 5-12
4. Texans: 4-13

AFC North
1. *Bengals: 12-5
2. *Ravens: 11-6
3. *Browns: 10-7
4. Steelers: 9-8

AFC East
1. *Bills: 11-6
2. *Jets: 11-6
3. Patriots: 10-7
4. Dolphins: 9-8

Super Bowl LVIII 
Bengals 33-30 over Cowboys

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/2023-nfl-season-predictions-picking-the-super-bowl-winner-playoff-matchups-and-final-record-for-all-32-teams/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NFC South is about what I think too. I‘m not doing the math to see if the records match up but what I see is

Atlanta 9-8

New Orleans 8-9

Carolina 7-10

Tampa 3-14

——-

Detroit 10-7

Minnesota 9-8

Green Bay 6-11

Chicago 6-11

——-

Dallas 11-6

Philly 8-9

New York 8-9

Washington 5-12

———

San Francisco 13-4

Seattle 9-8

LA 5-12

Arizona 3-14

———-

Jacksonville 12-5

Tennessee 8-9

Houston 5-12

Indianapolis 4-13

———-

New England 10-7

Miami 10-7

Buffalo 8-9

New York 7-10

———

Cincinnati 13-4

Pittsburgh 10-7

Baltimore 8-9

Cleveland 8-9

———

Kansas City 12-5

LA 10-7

Denver 8-9

Las. Vegas 6-11

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • OL should be taken in the first three rounds at least every other draft. thank you for coming to my ted talk 
    • Wide receivers, even the great ones (and they are rare) can get real expensive, real quick and are involved in say 40-70% of a team's plays, based on that team's particular style of offense. An edge rusher, DT or LB can very often be involved in 100% of the plays on defense.  It's a much better, more cost effective pick to grab one of those defenders (who are easier to evaluate and plug into a system) than to spin out yet another pick on a wide receiver. We're fair to middling, maybe even good with receivers right now. And ignoring a need in a draft might just be the dumbest way to work a draft. Really, just think about what you said.
    • We almost won with basically JAGs on defense without Brown and you guys are dooming? If DB plays we win that game, no doubt in my mind.  We have more picks to make this year and it will be nice to spend at least 5 or 6 of them on defense. I would like at least one OL.
×
×
  • Create New...