Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

USATODAY record predictions


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

I can't fault their prediction seeing as how we looked in the preseason and with all new staff and young QB and many new players etc. The Falcons are going to be improved I think and trending upward but not sure if they go 9-8 myself. Who knows but will be interesting to see how the Panthers play and how we hopefully improve as the season moves forward 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, t96 said:

That is outrageously bad…

Chiefs have only had 1 season 10-7 or worse (9-7) and it was with Alex Smith early in their rebuild under Reid, never have had under 12 wins with Mahomes as starter, that’s not changing this year.

 

AFCN is not going to have 4 10+ win teams… There are 12 guaranteed losses (assuming no ties) in the division, so they have across the 4 teams only 12 losses to non-Division teams all year (average 3 per team or an average record of 8-3 outside the division… yeah right)

 

no reason Cowboys and Vikings will drop off that much, Falcons aren’t making the playoffs, Cards and Raiders will not be that bad. Woof

I agreed with everything until you said the cardinals won't be that bad.  They might be the first team in the NFL to have less then 0 wins.  Their coach is a joke and their roster is dog poo 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CBS predictions:

NFC South
1. *Saints: 10-7
2. *Falcons: 9-8
3. Buccaneers: 7-10
4. Panthers: 6-11

NFC West
1. *49ers: 12-5
2. Seahawks: 8-9
3. Rams: 5-12
4. Cardinals: 3-14

NFC North
1. *Vikings: 9-8
2. *Lions: 9-8
3. Packers: 7-10
4. Bears: 6-11

NFC East
1. *Cowboys: 12-5
2. *Eagles: 12-5
3. Giants: 8-9
4. Commanders: 7-10

AFC West
1. *Chiefs: 12-5 
2. Chargers: 9-8
3. Broncos: 8-9
4. Raiders: 6-11

AFC South
1. *Titans: 9-8
2. Jaguars: 8-9 
3. Colts: 5-12
4. Texans: 4-13

AFC North
1. *Bengals: 12-5
2. *Ravens: 11-6
3. *Browns: 10-7
4. Steelers: 9-8

AFC East
1. *Bills: 11-6
2. *Jets: 11-6
3. Patriots: 10-7
4. Dolphins: 9-8

Super Bowl LVIII 
Bengals 33-30 over Cowboys

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/2023-nfl-season-predictions-picking-the-super-bowl-winner-playoff-matchups-and-final-record-for-all-32-teams/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NFC South is about what I think too. I‘m not doing the math to see if the records match up but what I see is

Atlanta 9-8

New Orleans 8-9

Carolina 7-10

Tampa 3-14

——-

Detroit 10-7

Minnesota 9-8

Green Bay 6-11

Chicago 6-11

——-

Dallas 11-6

Philly 8-9

New York 8-9

Washington 5-12

———

San Francisco 13-4

Seattle 9-8

LA 5-12

Arizona 3-14

———-

Jacksonville 12-5

Tennessee 8-9

Houston 5-12

Indianapolis 4-13

———-

New England 10-7

Miami 10-7

Buffalo 8-9

New York 7-10

———

Cincinnati 13-4

Pittsburgh 10-7

Baltimore 8-9

Cleveland 8-9

———

Kansas City 12-5

LA 10-7

Denver 8-9

Las. Vegas 6-11

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trying to help those 3 folks who hate this move.    In 2025 2.75 million is basically the new "vet" minimum.    They still need #3 RB and returner, draft could/should be the lane for that.    There's no downside to this move, they could cut with little effect and replace with your chosen rookie.   
    • Is it though? Even looking at just this past year, DK played 3 more games and had 81 more yards than Higgins had, but he also did it on less catches, with DK averaging 15 yards per catch and Higgins with 12.5. Yes, Higgins had 10 TDs to DK's 5, but I'd say that was far less about the WRs than the QBs, seeing as Burrow had 43 TDs (and only 9 INTs) to Geno's 21 TDs (and 15 INTs).  Swap the two of them last year and DK puts up better stats with Burrow as his QB than Higgins did, no doubt about it in my mind. DK has also only missed 3 games in his career, Higgins has missed 5 in each of the last 2 seasons. People here complain about our WR speed (and it's many people's biggest issue with T-Mac in the draft), but Higgins ran a 4.59 40 and DK ran a 4.33. DK has only played one more season than Higgins but he has 1,730 yards and 14 TDs more than Higgins, despite playing with the ghost of Russell Wilson and Geno Smith, while Higgins has had Burrow. To me, there is no debate, DK is a significantly better WR than Higgins.  Give him Burrow as his QB during his career and his numbers would dwarf what Higgins has put up.
    • Thanks to @CarolinaLivin for the Juan-like work!  
×
×
  • Create New...