Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Panthers and Brian Burns not at all close to extension


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

He’s actually posted his rumors he’s hearing before, he’s been right on a few occasions. I apologize, I cannot remember which rumors he was right about though.

It's iffy apparently the last tweet was from June? One of those believe it or don't situations.

But seeing that Burns is in uniform at practice lends credence to the notion they are likely ironing out a contract behind the scenes. Just have to wait it out.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ECHornet said:

If it's ~28mil as Hampton's tweet suggests, I hope it's "up to 28 million" based on incentives. ~$23-24mil base would be great.

I got to ask, why?

In the cap, as I understand it so please correct me if my info is wrong, LBTE (likely to be earned) incentives count against the cap, and are then refunded the following year if not met.  So the incentives count anyway.  We already have $51m in space for 2024.

So it really doesn't matter much if it's with incentives or not.  It's  going to be $28 million regardless.  Burns also wouldn't sign a deal with incentives that he couldn't meet.  He has the leverage at this point, not the Panthers.  We need him, and there are plenty of other teams who'd gladly spend the money on him.

Sources:

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/carolina-panthers/cap/2024/

https://russellstreetreport.com/salarycap/nfl-salary-cap-faqs/#:~:text=LTBEs count against the Salary,the Salary Cap this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, d-dave said:

I got to ask, why?

In the cap, as I understand it so please correct me if my info is wrong, LBTE (likely to be earned) incentives count against the cap, and are then refunded the following year if not met.  So the incentives count anyway.  We already have $51m in space for 2024.

So it really doesn't matter much if it's with incentives or not.  It's  going to be $28 million regardless.  Burns also wouldn't sign a deal with incentives that he couldn't meet.  He has the leverage at this point, not the Panthers.  We need him, and there are plenty of other teams who'd gladly spend the money on him.

Sources:

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/carolina-panthers/cap/2024/

https://russellstreetreport.com/salarycap/nfl-salary-cap-faqs/#:~:text=LTBEs count against the Salary,the Salary Cap this year.

I like two things about incentivizing the contracts:

1) knowing we’ll be paying a more appropriate amount based upon on-field performances if thresholds aren’t met, and…

2) still giving players some monetary bonuses to strive for excellent performance after big pay days. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

He's about to be paid like he does. Might as well accept it and stop hating on our best player.

I'm just being realistic. He actually disappears when it "counts", but yes he is going to get paid like he does. I like Burns, he's just a frustrating player because of the constant whiffs.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't get the Hunter hate. Just imagine his ceiling if he stopped trying to be this 2way freak and focused on one side of the ball 
    • 100%.  You have to play the cards that are dealt.  Not the cards you wish were dealt.
    • I'd say its definitely going to be addressed this off-season.  We went into the last draft with a roster of RBs including:  Chubba, Blackshear, and Miles Sanders. We picked Jonathan Brooks in the second and still signed Rashaad Penny afterwards.  Fast forward....One turned into a top 10 back, 1 is injured/out for most if not all the '25 season, 1 retired, 1 will either take a huge paycut or be cut, and the last is a restricted free agent. We brought in Mike Boone as well. Add him to the free agent list also.  We need a physical option.    Which qualifies:  Ashton Jeanty(Boise St): Overall ranked Top 10. Almost 2k yards after contact, 28 tds. Would take our first rounder. My money would be on an NFC East team selecting him. (97.2 PFF run grade) - 121 forced missed tackles.  Omarion Hampton(UNC): Ranked everywhere from 20 - 59 overall. Consensus #2 back after Jeanty. He'll be a second rounder. 1,222 Yards after contact w/ 15 tds.  (90.5 PFF run grade) - 72 forced missed Tackles Kaleb Johnson(Iowa): Ranked from 38 - 69 depending on which media outlet you prefer but generally #3. 2nd/3rd possibly. 1,060 Yards after contact w/ 21 tds.(86.7 PFF run grade)- 66 forced missed tackles Cam Skattebo: Ranked from the 50's - 104. Every mock I do he ends up BPA at some point. 969 Yards after contact w/ 17 tds(92 PFF Run Grade). Probably the best receiving back of the group. 81 forced missed tackles.  If the '24 and '25 draft classes were combined, IMO the rankings would be, in order: Jeanty, Hampton, Brooks, Johnson, Skattebo. I wouldn't take one high but I'd take one for Chubba and Brooks insurance. 
×
×
  • Create New...