Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Football 2023


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I was about to say, Clemson fans gotta be at least a tad nervous that here is another QB that looked really promising in spot duty as a freshman looking pretty trashy as the anointed starter.

Really been unimpressed with the playcalling given the hype of Garrett Riley too.  The bullshit quick screen game is too similar to last seasons nonsense. 
 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Duke dominated that half but shot themselves in the dick so many times they go to half trailing 7-6.

Duke returns 18 starters from a 9-4 team. They , once again will be better than most give them credit for. Clempson may be great again, and Duke just better than most think. Clempson has not run over them on offense or defense.

A lot of football left for Clempson to shine ( or Duke ) 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

Is Clemson this bad??  Duke this good or something in the middle? 

I think Duke is pretty good.  9 wins last year and return a lot. 

I think Clemson just lacks a working pass game.  I  think they got the rest to be really good.  Which has plagued them the last 2 years.   They got to get rid of this short screen WR game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

Is Clemson this bad??  Duke this good or something in the middle? 

Clemson is on the road in week 1 against a Duke team that went 9-4 last year returning the vast majority of it's starters alongside a very disciplined and well coached defense under Elko. Clemson also has a new OC and inexperienced QB at the helm. I honestly don't know what a lot of people expected.  I mean we're basically doing everything an underdog shouldn't do to win and are still only down by 1. Just don't know how the team'll hold up in the 2nd half once Clemson adjusts, this team doesn't got the blue chip prospects that Clemson does. But I don't know how much of this is necessarily an indictment on Clemson. With that being said their QB has looked very uninspiring so far and those DJU memories are probably still lingering among their fans.

Edited by beo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

Is Clemson this bad??  Duke this good or something in the middle? 

I don’t think Duke is as bad as people think they are and I certainly think Clemson is overrated. Klubnik only played significant snaps in two games.

He beat up on a bad UNC defense and got beat up on by a good Tennessee team.

This situation could play out very similar to the way the DJ Uiagalelei situation played out. Uiagalelei looked good filling in for Trevor Lawrence but as teams started to get more film on him we found out that he wasn’t nearly as good as we thought he was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Watching Rams/Eagles. Celebrating the St Louis Rams team that won the SB (Warner, Holt, etc..) while playing in Los Angeles seems wrong.  If I were in Los Angeles, no way I would attend a Rams game.  Probably wouldn't attend a Chargers game either.  Becoming a fan of a team that likes to move around just seems like a waste of energy as a fan.  
    • The only responses I am getting after providing statistics to put opinions in perspective seem to be from people who get angry and attack stats and people whose opinions differ from their own.  Have people on the Huddle ever overreacted, exaggerated, been wrong about players before?  Sure they have, so an alternative opinion with statistical support should not cause you to attack me or my views.  I am sorry your public schools failed you.  But your reactions are very revealing--you are stuck in Piaget's concrete operational stage--learn logic, how to debate a topic, and learn the difference between facts and emotional opinions.  When I paralleled Cam's stats with Jones' to point out how remarkably similar their careers have been to this point, It blew some 40 watt minds.  I think Jones, in a better situation, could be good--that should not upset you--
    • penalties and poor hands is what cost us in the RZ Bryce missing "high" in the back of the end zone is not an issue, you're taught as a QB to throw high in the back of end zone were only the receiver can catch or no one The duo of Ian Thomas and Tommy tremble can both go at the end of the season, both been here for multiple seasons and they've barely developed
×
×
  • Create New...