Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corral looked like Corap!


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

Didn’t have a good game regarding ball placement, but he made a lot of good decisions with the ball, and didn’t turn it over. He led an inefficient TD drive, but it was a TD drive nonetheless, and he showed his running ability. 
 

I still like what I see enough for him to be considered to develop as a backup. Dalton makes me feel that way even more. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

Didn’t have a good game regarding ball placement, but he made a lot of good decisions with the ball, and didn’t turn it over. He led an inefficient TD drive, but it was a TD drive nonetheless, and he showed his running ability. 
 

I still like what I see enough for him to be considered to develop as a backup. Dalton makes me feel that way even more. 


There are better backup options out there and always will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, top dawg said:

He had better hope that there was something in practice that we didn't see that has impressed the coaches. 

Yeah, I have been an apologist for him, but I can't say anything to his defense after tonight's performance...well...he can scramble. Anyway...

Luton looks like crap too.

I'm sorry for them, especially Corral.

 

I agree and i have been championing him as well..... hella bad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

Dalton was fine, one great play by a corner away from a nice TD drive. I will say, we should be sniping some of lions corners if they get cut.

Dalton looked like a backup QB. He's been around long enough for me to trust him to go .500 in the event the starter goes down. That's about as much as you can ask for your backup.

Corral looked like a third stringer with his accuracy.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MHS831 said:

Think of Corral as a rookie and understand that he is playing with people who he has no chemistry with.  I think he (OVERALL) had a decent preseason and deserves the #3 QB job.  With this staff and Dalton, I think a year will do him wonders.

We have had a lot of those long development project guys and we have never had one actually develop(at QB).

Is it worth investing multiple years and a roster spot to develop a solid 3rd string NfL QB? Or could you just sign one of those every year?

I will take the latter option 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Think of Corral as a rookie and understand that he is playing with people who he has no chemistry with.  I think he (OVERALL) had a decent preseason and deserves the #3 QB job.  With this staff and Dalton, I think a year will do him wonders.

Fair.

Thing is though, he's not necessarily on a team that has time to develop a rookie because they're gonna be busy developing that other rookie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

We have had a lot of those long development project guys and we have never had one actually develop(at QB).

Is it worth investing multiple years and a roster spot to develop a solid 3rd string NfL QB? Or could you just sign one of those every year?

I will take the latter option 

I think one of the things that could save him is the panthers traded a early 4th and future 3rd(which happened to be early too) for the right to draft him. But total new QB coaching staff and they could be like " hes not our type of QB and we can not improve him."

Ive been on a swing and miss with a few players, corral is on the list....

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

We have had a lot of those long development project guys and we have never had one actually develop(at QB).

Is it worth investing multiple years and a roster spot to develop a solid 3rd string NfL QB? Or could you just sign one of those every year?

I will take the latter option 

He will have to do this season.  If they get a chance to upgrade they will.  Until then he is a 3rd round project until he's replaced or he improves 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...