Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chark Injured?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

It seems they are serious about working to build the best roster in the league.  I hope they can pull it off because I like the philosophy.  Unfortunately they cannot fix everything in one offseason. Injuries, or the lack thereof will dictate how successful this team will be this season.  The next offseason will be critical to hit on the draft picks to strengthen this team.

 

Drafting well every year is the best was to stay relevant year after year. Normally it's easier said than done. But we have a pretty good evaluation system in place. Fingers crossed.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, t96 said:

Chark was 27th in yards as the defacto number 1 on a bad Jags team that played from behind a ton and had pretty terrible WRs, sure he "made the pro bowl" but considering a guy like Tyler Huntley has also made a pro bowl I don't consider that to mean anything. Chark is a solid deep threat when healthy but I wouldn't say he's much more than that. Important skillset to have but Thielen moves the chains and gets TDs and is an incredible route runner. Out of the slot that is way more important to this team than Chark. And while Mingo will probably have growing pains, he has the overall skillset to be a legit #1 WR and has already been earning Bryce's trust as his favorite target throughout camp. I view that as more important to this season than Chark as well. Due to rookie growing pains a healthy Chark could maybe have more of an impact on the field immediately but Mingo will easily surpass him given time. I'm super high on Mingo though

You have a right to your opinion, but as one who has watched most of Chark's catches, I disagree that he's only a one-trick pony (though a deep threat is important also). He also makes catches that move the chains, and he is a solid red zone threat. Chark also has great hands and phenomenal ball tracking skills. All you have to do is watch his catches. Is he going to juke people like Moore, or take a hit and keep on going like Smitty, or like what we saw Mingo do? No. But his skills should not be underappreciated. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, top dawg said:

You have a right to your opinion, but as one who has watched most of Chark's catches, I disagree that he's only a one-trick pony (though a deep threat is important also). He also makes catches that move the chains, and he is a solid red zone threat. Chark also has great hands and phenomenal ball tracking skills. All you have to do is watch his catches. Is he going to juke people like Moore, or take a hit and keep on going like Smitty, or like what we saw Mingo do? No. But his skills should not be underappreciated. 

Chark is every bit a very solid number 2 when healthy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Something I find interesting is that you are more likely to find successful players as UDFA's than you are to find them with a single pick in any round past 3.  Those 3rd round compensatory choices?  Largely worthless.  Yes, I get it, there are a lot more UDFA's than there are drafted players in later rounds.  Basically, if you're fishing for starters you are simply not going to find anything in Rounds 4 - 7 with any regularity.
    • the argument that Dan Morgan was assistant GM for years while running counter to everything both his bosses signed off on (who look down at him and his staff for info).....is a tough sell.  I feel we do a variant of this every year.  You aren't this bad...becuase of 1 person.  You are this bad because of LOTS of bad people.  It was never just Joe Brady.  Which is why firing him didn't lead to better offense.  It was never just Matt Rhule.  It was never just Fitterer.    As bad as we are, we need to scorch Earth this puppy and quit letting people who were part of making the mess be the designed folks to lead us out of the mess.  when David Tepper and Jim Caldwell found the answer on the roster......it was clear from the jump nothing had really changed.   
    • "Buckaroo." That's good. 🤣👍 Mature beyond his years, clearly. Brian Burns was a far more justifiable asset to trade for a good return during the 2022 season, than DJ Moore (who was shipped out the following spring). Do you disagree? Let me know. I'd have traded Burns before McCaffrey, and I wouldn't have traded Moore at all. It's possible, despite what Morgan and Fitterer display, to turn down a bad offer. Thirty-one other teams are aware of this. That brings me to Johnson: if your "leverage" is "he wasn't gonna re-sign," you have no leverage; which, as you said, means you shouldn't make a trade, right? Do you disagree? If so, quickly adjust your prior stance. Giving up No. 1 in 6 and a standout WR, even if he's petulant, for No. 30-32 in 5 = demonstrably stupid. Keep the comp pick if he re-signs, or see if he can be convinced to stay with a new non-Shedeur QB.
×
×
  • Create New...