Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Giants game


t96
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Castavar said:

At some point we gotta be honest with ourselves, Frank Reich has had a trend of starting off seasons slow. He also lost to a bad 2-14 Jags team in a must win game to go to the playoffs.

I had convinced myself we had a real NFL coaching staff but now I'm beginning to wonder if we actually fired Rhule and company because this does not look like a decently coached team.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Shocker said:

LOL…we aren’t showing our cards here.  People on this board are so ridiculous 

Yes. Jets and Giants doing it wrong.  All these other teams too.  You need to not try.  And then try week 1.   Keep it all a big secret.  Because a rookie, new scheme, etc can just flip a switch week 1.  

Frank has a secret formula no one else understands 

  • Pie 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

Frank looks at his notepad.

 

 

Im already not liking this dude. He looks emotionless on the sidelines. 

 

Steve Wilks I miss you man!

Yelling and throwing tantrums on the sidelines is McDaniels type of poo. 
 

wilks never even threw tantrums on the sideline… he was cool as a cucumber the whole time

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like every team but us can get to the end zone with ease so far this preseason.

Can't help but think of the Colts fans laughing their asses off at us taking Reich off their hands. Hoping he cleans this mess up and makes them eat their words but ooooof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Frank looks at his notepad.

 

 

Im already not liking this dude. He looks emotionless on the sidelines. 

He's very well known as a stoic/unemotional sideline type.  If you didn't know that then that's kind of on you.  But also not a reason to get riled up about...at all. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...