Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft day 2010


Swarly

Recommended Posts

Let's say that there isn't a legitimate QB to choose from when our pick roles around in round 2.. would you guys be opposed to maybe trading it for a 2011 1st rounder like 49ers did to us(and seahawks did to denver)? Chances are we'll be pretty high in round 2, so there will still be valuable players available to choose from.

Facing facts, there is very little if any chance of getting high enough in round 1 for one of the star QB's, and I am completely against trading Stewart or whoever else people are throwing around these days to get into round 1(like it's possible, RB's are a dime a dozen).

We won't be able to get a QB ready to start in round 2, and with Jake Locker entering in 2011, we'd have a legitimate chance of trading up to him with 2 first rounders. We could try to fill our needs through free agency by picking up Campbell(who is better than some of the later QB's that will be available in draft.) Worst comes to worst, we have 2 first rounders in 2011, and a chance to pick a real franchise QB for the future.

Just a little idea. I'm bored as poo lately with the semester ending, and nothing to do, so take it with a grain of salt =P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would not be opposed to it.

If we could somehow pick up an additional second rounder (vet clearout if a new FO comes in) I would be all for it. The more early firsts we can get hold of, the better chance we have of getting a genuine QB.

I still feel we need to draft someone in the second round though, otherwise we will be in trouble next season as well for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would not be opposed to it.

If we could somehow pick up an additional second rounder (vet clearout if a new FO comes in) I would be all for it. The more early firsts we can get hold of, the better chance we have of getting a genuine QB.

I still feel we need to draft someone in the second round though, otherwise we will be in trouble next season as well for sure.

Yeah, I'd hate to give up a 2nd round pick, but QB is the biggest need. If Golden Tate is available, I would LOVE to pick him, but he will probably go in round 1 :\

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DrewBreesIsGod

Let's say that there isn't a legitimate QB to choose from when our pick roles around in round 2.. would you guys be opposed to maybe trading it for a 2011 1st rounder like 49ers did to us(and seahawks did to denver)? Chances are we'll be pretty high in round 2, so there will still be valuable players available to choose from.

Facing facts, there is very little if any chance of getting high enough in round 1 for one of the star QB's, and I am completely against trading Stewart or whoever else people are throwing around these days to get into round 1(like it's possible, RB's are a dime a dozen).

We won't be able to get a QB ready to start in round 2, and with Jake Locker entering in 2011, we'd have a legitimate chance of trading up to him with 2 first rounders. We could try to fill our needs through free agency by picking up Campbell(who is better than some of the later QB's that will be available in draft.) Worst comes to worst, we have 2 first rounders in 2011, and a chance to pick a real franchise QB for the future.

Just a little idea. I'm bored as poo lately with the semester ending, and nothing to do, so take it with a grain of salt =P

all I have to say to you is "I got my f ucking pitch back!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

only way that this happens is if hurney and fox aren't here. you don't pull stunts like that if your butt is on the hot seat.

i still don't like that idea because that means we don't have a pick until round 3 and there are still quite a few needs that must be met. it isn't just QB. we could be getting a DT/NT or WR....FS...SLB....no way to we pass up on opportunities to help out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

only way that this happens is if hurney and fox aren't here. you don't pull stunts like that if your butt is on the hot seat.

i still don't like that idea because that means we don't have a pick until round 3 and there are still quite a few needs that must be met. it isn't just QB. we could be getting a DT/NT or WR....FS...SLB....no way to we pass up on opportunities to help out there.

Yeah, I can see your point, but will we be able to get a DT/NT that will be as start-ready as Kemo/Tank Tyler? and Sherod Martin proved he can be a legit back up(maybe even starter) to Godfrey. WR/LB I DEFINITELY agree, we need to address that issue. Just throwing ideas out there.

best show in TV hands down...I'm Kenny f'ing Powers! The golden arm, Dr. Cock N' Balls....

definitely, can't freakin wait until the new season starts!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Draft Golden Tate with the 2nd and let Moore have one year behind center before we draft a QB in 2011, unless Moore have really impressed

Golden Tate will not make it past 1st round, as much as I'd like to think otherwise, he just won't :[

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As we look at these prospects, I can never quite grasp which “edge” projects as a 4-3 end and which projects as a 3-4 olb. Is there even a distinction anymore? I always think of the smaller Von Millers and Micah Parsons as the 3-4 OLB types and I’m thinking someone like Peppers as the 4-3 end but then I guess Peppers played OLB in GB.  It also seems like the OLBs end up walking up to the line half of the time.  Anyone have any tips on discerning the difference, especially in Evero’s defense?
    • Poor kid. Here's hoping he someday gets a chance. In the meantime, someone else will be getting an opportunity and hopefully they can make the most of it.  
    • This is it. The Panthers don't have the draft picks or salary cap to approach the offseason position-by-position. That's for teams much further along. They'll have to address "mission areas" rather than individuals, and they'll need to be creative rather than taking a linear approach. I'd add "improve the pass rush: as 1B with "improving the run defense" as 1A. Trying to upgrade every weak position is just not feasible. It'll take 2 or 3 great drafts. For instance, a guy like Luvu that can play the run and rush the QB would be huge in both areas. A fix? No. But a definite improvement. We're focused on a WR1, when a guy like CMC would provide a playmaking option that defenses will have to account for in the passing and running game. And I think an explosive playmaker is more important than adding another guy that can catch the ball in traffic. We have that in spades. Can't solve this riddle in one offseason without taking away from current areas of strength. It's a puzzle that won't be easy to solve. And they'll need to be future focused while being current competent.  My opinions/approach: I'm thinking the focus should be on defensive players that are good at both the run and pass pressure rather than specialists. A stout run-stopping OLB that can also pressure the QB is the better option for the Panthers right now, rather than a sack specialist. We had a pure pass rusher with Burns. Teams just ran the ball at him and took him out of games. A DT that can consistently get in the backfield and disrupt plays rather than a run stuffing NT is probably a better option for the Panthers right now too - Mason Graham. That addresses both the pass and run. Neither of these players would have great numbers, but they'd improve the defense and force offenses to scheme rather than just impose their will. That's when we'll see what Evero is really about. A later round speed WR that forces defenses to keep a safety over the top would really open up the offense - a Ted Ginn Jr type. Maybe a true pass receiving RB that can make guys miss in the open field. These guys aren't usually conventional early round draft picks but they'll improve the team in mission areas rather than focus areas. 
×
×
  • Create New...