Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Oboy......John Fox


cartier600

Recommended Posts

I am absolutely convinced John Fox enjoys winning with field goal, hell after watching this the fix was in... Call me stupid call me whatever i think fox let Drew try and get that record... but hey the panthers won so i will not complain... but this cardiac cat sh*t is getting crazy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...if we didnt have Dlo... we'd be 8-8...we started running up the middle at 8 minutes into the 3rd quarter for no yardage and fox kept doing it and doing it and doing it, inspite of getting any real yardage, we didnt even keep the D honest with a dump or a slant. oh, and here is a news flash: THE FRICKIN SMOKE ROUTE DOESNT WORK ANYMO... I just dont know how you can dominate like we have done in the last 2 games and cough it up in the last 5 minutes....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...if we didnt have Dlo... we'd be 8-8...we started running up the middle at 8 minutes into the 3rd quarter for no yardage and fox kept doing it and doing it and doing it, inspite of getting any real yardage, we didnt even keep the D honest with a dump or a slant. oh, and here is a news flash: THE FRICKIN SMOKE ROUTE DOESNT WORK ANYMO... I just dont know how you can dominate like we have done in the last 2 games and cough it up in the last 5 minutes....

You need some ibuprofen and a nap. I can tell.

What you're saying is that we wouldn't be as good as we are if we didn't have a running back who rushed for over 1400 yards...

No team would be as good if they lost that kind of offensive power...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...