Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Delhomme Starts Sunday....


AKPantherFan

Recommended Posts

What do you mean by "best chance to win"? Are you basing that on regular season records? Performance against a common opponent? What? Because all I've heard in this thread is people regurgitating this throw in comment without explanation.

I really hadn't thought much about it given I figure that Moore will play this week. But against Minnesota in 2008 his rating was 79. In 2005 he had a rating of 141. I doubt that tells us much. Against Favre or Green Bay, Jake is 2-1 with a rating 100. Again not much to go on. For me Jake will air it out good and bad and will do what he can to win. Moore seems too cautious and unwilling to take chances and throw the ball. I think Moore could air it out and give us a chance to win but the question is will he? We probably lose no matter who plays but for me if you are going to lose anyway, go out slugging playing to win instead of playing it safe and being content with losing by only a little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

explain to what moore has done to lose the starting job......and the would coulda poo needs to go....moore could have throw 5 ints but he didn't just like jake could have thrown less int but he clearly didn't.what the f are you expecting moore to do carry the team on his back?????

Moore won the starting job largely because Jake in his last 2 outings led the offense to score 17 points and then 6 points, both losses. The thinking must have been that with less turnovers we would be more successful.

So Moore gets the starts and our offense scores 16 and 10 points in his 2 outings but we win one of them only due to our best defensive performance of the year after scoring a measly 16 points.

So Fox has to decide whether to go with someone who can play bad or good and can score 6 points or 36 or do you give Moore another try and see if he can score 20 points in a game. It isn't as cut and dry as people would want you to believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah but really do you expect him to come off the bench and lite the scoreboard up,plus our running game against the pats was all but abandon.He needs to put Jarret on the bench until he can stop jogging routes, and put Rosario in at 3wr sets.

hopefully we can do something that hasn't been done on the vikes in a while RUN THE BALL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah but really do you expect him to come off the bench and lite the scoreboard up,plus our running game against the pats was all but abandon.He needs to put Jarret on the bench until he can stop jogging routes, and put Rosario in at 3wr sets.

hopefully we can do something that hasn't been done on the vikes in a while RUN THE BALL!

Yeah I expect him to come in and throw good passes and lead us to scores. He is the starter for an NFL team and needs to do the job or be replaced. And the reason the running game didn't work as well as hoped was because Moore couldn't throw the ball well enough to back the safeties off the line and make them respect the play action.

As for running the ball on the vikings, it won't happen unless you can pass on them first. Unless Moore can use the pass to set up the run, we are in for a rather long Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

safeties didn't make plays,there beat up d line did ty warren bust through every counter play.in 5 weeks you expect moore to move the ball up the field at ease,come on he needs a little bit more time for that.he threw well enough against the pats,some other factors played a big role in that game including penalties,drop balls,ect

Link to comment
Share on other sites

safeties didn't make plays,there beat up d line did ty warren bust through every counter play.in 5 weeks you expect moore to move the ball up the field at ease,come on he needs a little bit more time for that.he threw well enough against the pats,some other factors played a big role in that game including penalties,drop balls,ect

Seriously I make as many typos as anyone on this board, but honestly it is hard to follow your train of thought without some form of rudimentary grammar and sentence structure. This is not a Gertrude Stein stream of consciousness writing is it.

I am not trying to negate your points just trying to figure out what they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I expect him to come in and throw good passes and lead us to scores. He is the starter for an NFL team and needs to do the job or be replaced.

Seriously?

And the reason the running game didn't work as well as hoped was because Moore couldn't throw the ball well enough to back the safeties off the line and make them respect the play action.

Replace Moore with Delhomme and it's basically almost every game Jake has played this year. We run at 8 and 9 in the box. We have success against teams that we dominate hard enough to make up for our QB's terrible play and our coaches thick, neanderthal skulls.

As for running the ball on the vikings, it won't happen unless you can pass on them first. Unless Moore can use the pass to set up the run, we are in for a rather long Sunday.

Just like every other Sunday under Jake, or whoever decides to play QB for this team this year. Every week it's the same.. it doesn't matter. If we can run against 5000 people in the box, and Jake doesn't throw 50 interceptions, we will win.

That's how it's been every week, boring as hell, but it doesn't change with Matt Moore in there. It just makes a lot of us a little less pissed off when Jake isn't in there because he's imploded so many times.

Matt Moore, being cheap and young, could possibly serve as some kind of stop-gap for this team next season while another QB is being groomed/found. While it's unlikely that Moore will ever be very good, or even good enough, it's more likely than the 0% chance that Jake is worth anything.

At this point I'd rather not use a QB and just direct snap the ball to the RB, because it would cut out the middle man and give us an extra blocker. We are terrible at the QB position, and the only argument for starting Jake borders on insanity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And people wonder why no one outside of the Carolinas respects, cares for, gives a poo about, or thinks about the Panthers.

We still have crazy fans talking about how we should be starting Jake.(or by some crazy logic that he gives us the best chance to win)

Now how can people want to be taken seriously with bullshit like this?

Just checked the calendar and lo and behold it isn't 2003. Sorry Jake doesn't give us the best chance to win, drop it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If Canales comes back and Bryce doesn’t I would probably prefer to bring in 3 guys he likes from around the league or maybe outside a top ten pick and work through them, give that a shot. Because if we win a few more games we won’t be in the running for the top rated QB prospects anyway. 
    • You mean tepper but yeah I agree about rhule   Baker is a top 3 potential qb that is play for mvp and he is doing it with a slew of injuries
    • There’s too many to reply to so I’ll just say a couple more things then I’m out: 1. It hasn’t been both ways and that’s the point. People saying stuff like “too bad Bryce Young didn’t make that tackle” is a direct result of the ridiculousness of blaming Bryce Young for literally everything. I remember one game day thread a poster unironically blamed Bryce Young for JT Sanders flipping onto his own neck and injuring himself. That post was pied. I literally just read a post blaming Bryce Young for XL dropping a ball on a would-be game winning drive last year. This past week, when Tmac bounced a ball off his hands for an interception, Bryce Young was immediately blamed in the game day thread. Alternatively, people who try to give credit to Bryce Young are immediately told that to credit Bryce Young is taking away credit from Rico Dowdle, OL, whoever, and that they shouldn’t be talking positively about Bryce Young because he doesn’t deserve any credit. 2. Yes, there have always been bad posters, the difference is that back then they were largely derided. Bryce Young’s rookie season, when many of us were simply pointing at the train wreck of the whole team and saying it was maybe a little tough to evaluate Bryce Young when he had no time to throw and slow receivers, and just saying basic stuff like “Bryce Young can physically throw the ball further than 20 yards.” There was an attempt made to limit all those opinions to a single thread, by a mod. This is like saying lunatics running the asylum is normal because there have always been lunatics in the asylum. The difference is before they were patients, now they’re in charge. 3. I know for a fact I am labeled as one of the “Bryce Stans” by many of the usual suspects, but the fact of the matter is they have no idea what my position is on Bryce Young because any attempts at nuanced discussion in the past have been so completely pointless due to never being able to get past the hyperbole. How can we have a serious conversation if you insist he is physically incapable of throwing a football 20 yards? Or if you insist that he somehow duped the Panthers into drafting him just by drinking water? Or if you insist that he should be able to succeed behind one of the worst offensive lines I’ve ever seen (rookie year, not now). And I’m not the only one, there are many who have left the huddle because of it and started a discord server, I’m just too lazy for another app.
×
×
  • Create New...