Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lost


Matt Foley

Recommended Posts

The people in the chopper get back to the real world

The people on the island start traveling through time

Most of the people on the island get killed by the others(back in the 50s)

Locke stops everyone traveling through time but gets ported off the island

Island stops in the 70s, when the Darma people are on the island, people on island join Darma

Ben cons everyone to go back to the island, killing Locke in the process

Everyone ends up back on the island with extra people included, some in the past(70s) some in the present

Locke is 'alive' again in the present, assumes leadership of the others, leads the others to go see Jacob

Back in the 70s the nerdy physicist figures out a way to get them back to the future by blowing up a nuke, he gets killed by his young mother

Jacob is shown back in the 19th century, has a nemesis that wants to kill him

Locke convinces Ben to kill Jacob, he does, other people show Lockes dead body(the alive Locke wasn't actually Locke - speculate away)

The 'incident' happens at the Darma station back in the 70s and they set off the nuke

Fin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The people in the chopper get back to the real world

The people on the island start traveling through time

Most of the people on the island get killed by the others(back in the 50s)

Locke stops everyone traveling through time but gets ported off the island

Island stops in the 70s, when the Darma people are on the island, people on island join Darma

Ben cons everyone to go back to the island, killing Locke in the process

Everyone ends up back on the island with extra people included, some in the past(70s) some in the present

Locke is 'alive' again in the present, assumes leadership of the others, leads the others to go see Jacob

Back in the 70s the nerdy physicist figures out a way to get them back to the future by blowing up a nuke, he gets killed by his young mother

Jacob is shown back in the 19th century, has a nemesis that wants to kill him

Locke convinces Ben to kill Jacob, he does, other people show Lockes dead body(the alive Locke wasn't actually Locke - speculate away)

The 'incident' happens at the Darma station back in the 70s and they set off the nuke

Fin

I knew it was going to be predictable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I realize it about the expectations, but on paper, we drafted players who would have a chance to compete at positions where any could realistically step in and take the job---Freeling?  Yup.  Hunter?  Yup.  Brazzell?  Yup.  It is likely that all three see the field early and often.  Day 3:  Lee?  I see him as the #3 CB and the job is his when they are ready for him--and it is his to lose.  Hecht?  I loved him in mock research and called him the best C in the draft.  He might play a year behind Fortson or he could take the job--regardless, he is the obvious front runner for the 2027 season.  Wheatley?  I see Ransom and Moehrig as basically the same "in the box" type S.  If Wheatley can learn for a season behind Scott, he has the tools to be a serviceable FS, something this team needs.  Finally, Kuwatch seemed to be a PS pick, and he could be--but to win the 4th ILB job, he needs to beat out Bam Morris-Scott and with a 46.5 vertical (I can't do that on the triple jump) and a superior RAS rating, he looks like a special teamer and depth piece.....I forgot about Morgan's comment about giving up the 5th--probably to get ahead of Detroit.  Freeling has the athleticism and the tools to be the best OT in this draft.  The others lacked arm length or something like that--Freeling simply lacks a ton of experience. 
    • excellent points and insights.  I agree on Tepper.  I guess I worry that his questions and comments might influence the thinking of his employees, that his presence in the room might add pressure to an already stressful situation, but after watching it again, it does not appear to be like that.  Morgan was in charge.  Canales mentioned needing a center, but beyond that, he was there to serve as a consultant, more or less, if asked.  I suppose my point was this--everyone knew their roles, I did not see egos--I saw empowerment.  As for Morgan--I saw a leader that listened to others, made wise decisions, and never lost control.  I was VERY IMPRESSED with Dan Morgan. 
    • Pretty good summation, although I would caution just a bit that there might be a little of over-enhanced expectations. I do agree with the assessment on BPA. It was exceedingly clear they had a specific shopping list. Early on when there was some discussion about the tackles available, Morgan was asked if he was willing to give up a 5th to get Freeling, if it came to that. I think the only way it wasn't a left tackle with that 1st pick is if none that were valued as a 1st were still available.
×
×
  • Create New...