Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scott Fowler on Bryce Young


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Cdparr7 said:

It’s reasonable considering it was his 4th NFL training camp. He is attempting harder throws at NFL speed with NFL talent to test his limits and likely the limits of his receivers which will develop chemistry over time. 
 

No cause for alarm right now. However, come week 8 and he’s thrown interceptions in 8 straight games, that may be some cause for concern.

Honestly, if he could achieve two TD's to one INT every game (average), say 34 TD's to 17 INT's, of course, who wouldn't take that? If the Panthers have a strong running game this year, which based on our roster is highly probable, I think this could happen. Even if it's more like 24 TD's to 12 INT's. If it's close to that 2 to 1 average, that would be a success IMO. 

So, who cares if he throws an INT in 8 straight games? That could end up meaning nothing. Especially if he has 15 to 17 TD's to go with it, and the Panthers have as winning record.

We can throw "what if's" up here every day. Bottom line, we'll find out soon enough.

 

Edited by Dragoon11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

And to refresh you guys memory fowler wrote the article stating it should be wilks full stop as our next coach and he is also the dumb fug that asked Reich at his presser what he thought of the qbs on the roster when it was just only an injured matt corral that was under contract.

 

he is a dumb mother fuger that somehow has kept his job for 3 decades.  His dad was even worse.

Well you just solved your own mystery didn’t you 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is he that dumb if his article has been read and discussed a lot?  Scott Fowler has a job to do, and clicks drive revenue.

am I worried?  Nope.  It’s Training Camp, and the coaches want him to see what he can get away with before games count.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, WUnderhill said:

Yes, he’s wrong. He knows that throwing a few interceptions in training camp is little cause for concern, especially given Reich’s comments today when he confirmed that they are encouraging Bryce to take risks in practice to find out what works. He chose to sensationalize Bryce’s interceptions in camp to make people think they are excessive and are a cause for concern, neither of which are the case. Yellow journalism is alive and well.

Seriously, throwing 1 single pick in each practice is hardly noteworthy or reason for concern.  How many passes is he throwing total?  What specific situations are the working on?  What if the coaches (as stated) are asking him to be more aggressive?  Why not tell how many TDs hes thrown along with those INTs?  AND STOP fuging KEEPING STATS IN PRACTICE FOR fugS SAKE!!

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Dragoon11 said:

Honestly, if he could achieve two TD's to one INT every game (average), say 34 TD's to 17 INT's, of course, who wouldn't take that? If the Panthers have a strong running game this year, which based on our roster is highly probable, I think this could happen. Even if it's more like 24 TD's to 12 INT's. If it's close to that 2 to 1 average, that would be a success IMO. 

So, who cares if he throws an INT in 8 straight games? That could end up meaning nothing. Especially if he has 15 to 17 TD's to go with it, and the Panthers have as winning record.

We can throw "what if's" up here every day. Bottom line, we'll find out soon enough.

 

I meant it as at least 1 in each one. So in my head I was thinking if we get to week 8 and he has like 12-16 interceptions and interceptions in each game it would be concerning.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeff Rikard (spelling ?) On wfnz said anyone in media bringing this up is doing so because there is nothing but good news so far. He called out anyone stat keeping in camp 

 

He's the only one there that's worth listening too in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of hate for Scott Fowler here.  My take is that he attempts to try to look objective...does not want to be a homer but a reporter. As he was here before the team......like he has to prove himself.

As for the headline...did he write that??  i hear often editors write or change headlines so who knows.  Certainly know the Observer needs the clicks.  They have proven they cannot afford to keep the really good sports reporters they get.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

Lots of hate for Scott Fowler here.  My take is that he attempts to try to look objective...does not want to be a homer but a reporter. As he was here before the team......like he has to prove himself.

As for the headline...did he write that??  i hear often editors write or change headlines so who knows.  Certainly know the Observer needs the clicks.  They have proven they cannot afford to keep the really good sports reporters they get.

He has been a cuck loser for 30 years.  Even the fuging the poo head tom sorenson was a better writer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trying to help those 3 folks who hate this move.    In 2025 2.75 million is basically the new "vet" minimum.    They still need #3 RB and returner, draft could/should be the lane for that.    There's no downside to this move, they could cut with little effect and replace with your chosen rookie.   
    • Is it though? Even looking at just this past year, DK played 3 more games and had 81 more yards than Higgins had, but he also did it on less catches, with DK averaging 15 yards per catch and Higgins with 12.5. Yes, Higgins had 10 TDs to DK's 5, but I'd say that was far less about the WRs than the QBs, seeing as Burrow had 43 TDs (and only 9 INTs) to Geno's 21 TDs (and 15 INTs).  Swap the two of them last year and DK puts up better stats with Burrow as his QB than Higgins did, no doubt about it in my mind. DK has also only missed 3 games in his career, Higgins has missed 5 in each of the last 2 seasons. People here complain about our WR speed (and it's many people's biggest issue with T-Mac in the draft), but Higgins ran a 4.59 40 and DK ran a 4.33. DK has only played one more season than Higgins but he has 1,730 yards and 14 TDs more than Higgins, despite playing with the ghost of Russell Wilson and Geno Smith, while Higgins has had Burrow. To me, there is no debate, DK is a significantly better WR than Higgins.  Give him Burrow as his QB during his career and his numbers would dwarf what Higgins has put up.
    • Thanks to @CarolinaLivin for the Juan-like work!  
×
×
  • Create New...