Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Next Steps...Assessing the Team


saX man
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

Still an awful roster

I would usually agree with this, but after seeing Miami (and others) do well with our outcasts, I think this team needs an overhaul at coaching/GM.  I do not trust this "brainfart" to do anything no matter who is on the roster.

Let the young guys play and get rid of the dead weight (Hayward and Oubre, especially).

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

Still an awful roster

We have a PG, SF/SG, and C with nice potential. Hayward and Rozier are solid vets to have if we resign Miles (not a fan) that’s another big man. Not a great roster, but could be fun in with the right staff to develop them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

Guess I'm a homer but with the addition of Bridges and Miller I think the team is very solid.

I'll believe it when I see it. Until then, I have no expectations for this team to do anything good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 33inNC said:

I'll believe it when I see it. Until then, I have no expectations for this team to do anything good. 

Mark Williams looks like he could be legit as well, that's a nice starting 5. Granted Miller is the unknown. Very smooth but the shot looks a little flat. Much like a Miller Lite. I thought Lamelos shot was ugly too but hey if it works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please do not turn Gordon's expiring contract into a poo sandwich of another overpaid player that we have to eat for 3 years.  Just let him play out the contract and move on. I'm sick of watching this team swap bad contract for worse contract every fuging year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That team made the play in game two years ago with Bridges and Lamelo. Now they've got Williams, Miller and nick Smith to add to that. Possibly able to move rozier or Hayward for another piece. 

 

No reason they don't make the playoffs as at least the 7th or 8th seed, but should be the 6th if everyone comes back and plays like they can. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Is a Miles Bridges for Paul George sign n trade realistic?

 

Clippers have PG on the trade block. Would be nice to get Miller his GOAT to mentor him.

Maybe Miles and Rozier plus some. Would Miller and PG be too similar of players though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...