Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Miller's gun case


MechaZain
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

Miles Bridges beat his wife but didn't murder her. So he's good in your book, right? 

Nope I don't respect women beaters. If his wife dropped the chargers what more can you do?

 

I will never respect Bridges as a man, but life goes on I don't really care to talk down on him for the rest of his life. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cam Lawter said:

I bet you are the same type of person that would defend the shitheads that instead of helping someone, they just record it. Old lady is getting beat up and robbed and you just sit there. Technically, you can't charge them with anything but they are a piece of poo.

You would have the same energy for them " They didn't do anything wrong! The police cleared them of a crime!"

I was always taught to only defend my family. When you jump into other people's problems is where you can risk your own life.

 

If I see a crime I call 911. Im not the law so im not risking my life to be a superhero unless it's my family. Is that harsh? 

 

Iv'e seen to many innocent people lose their lives because they wanted to be a superhero. The law says if you see someone in danger call 911. Only time I break that law is if family is involved and it's a life or death situation.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I was always taught to only defend my family. When you jump into other people's problems is where you can risk your own life.

 

If I see a crime I call 911. Im not the law so im not risking my life to be a superhero unless it's my family. Is that harsh? 

 

Iv'e seen to many innocent people lose their lives because they wanted to be a superhero. The law says if you see someone in danger call 911. Only time I break that law is if family is involved and it's a life or death situation.

 

 

I didn't ask if you would intervene. I asked if you would defend them of being a shitty person.

I rest my case 😂

Edited by Cam Lawter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

I'd like someone to show me where I blamed him for murdering anyone. Good luck, because you're not going to find it. You can, however, question someone's life choices and make that valid concern known without brushing it aside because *mouth waters* he in the league and he got money

 

 

Pretty sure Miller isn't the only person to bring a friend a gun. What that friend does with his gun is his problem. How do you not understand that?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Cam Lawter said:

I didn't ask if you would intervene. I asked if you would defend them of being a shitty person.

I rest my case 😂

Brandon Miller brought his friend a gun. If that's a shitty person then I feel sorry for the millions of people who have committed this same act.lmao

 

Bro are you just miserable a person?

 

You have yet to place blame on the actual killer. All you want to talk about is a kid who brought a friend his gun. Are you okay?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Brandon Miller brought his friend a gun. If that's a shitty person then I feel sorry for the millions of people who have committed this same act.lmao

 

Bro are you just miserable a person?

 

You have yet to place blame on the actual killer. All you want to talk about is a kid who brought a friend his gun. Are you okay?

I see we are deflecting now 😂

I feel like this whole conversation is a "WHOOSH" over your head. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Carl Spackler said:

I'm none of your fuging business years old. Where did you go to college?

Keep ranting my man. Maybe someone with power will hear you out and get murda man Miller behind bars.

 

It's time to start focusing on basketball. If he did something wrong im sure they will reopen the case then we can have some discussion on his future off the court.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think it was less Tepper mandating it and more Tepper finally relenting and allowing it. I've always maintained that I think what caused Reich to be fired midseason was likely him going to Tepper and saying something along the lines of "Either let me play Dalton and five this team a chance to compete or just go ahead and fire me now."
    • I honestly think it was a mutual, collective decision. Canales might have been hired to be the Panthers head  coach because he was the best chance to get Bryce where he needed to be to succeed and did everything...I mean he and Morgan did EVERYTHING possible to create a successful situation for Bryce. And it was obvious... painfully obvious that not only was it not working, the team was losing and it was effecting everything. Canales was hired because they thought he could help Bryce, but he was hired as the PANTHERS head coach, not Bryce's personal coach. If everyone could see this was failing far beyond what anyone could have and it didn't look like it was anything that could be fixed quickly....then that everyone who could see would have to include Canales himself who is responsible for not just Bryce, but the whole damn team has to have looked at what it was doing to the team and their chances to win and said, we have to choose what is best for Bryce or the Panthers. He came in and said he had no personal attachment to any player, and that means he has no personal attachment to Bryce. He's going to do what is best to help the team win. If that means benching Bryce, then that's what he's going to do. Did he make this call without Teppers blessing or input? Hell no. Did they come into the Monday meeting having both come to the same conclusion regarding Bryce? I would have a hard time arguing that wasn't the case. All in leadership has to have seen it wasn't just not working...it was killing the team and they had to make this switch for the betterment of the team soon or else lose the season completely. No way would Canales had bern campaigning for Bryce to stay in there. He's not that dumb. Sometimes regardless of the work you do, you have to realize when it's futile and the earlier you recognize it, the better off you will be.
×
×
  • Create New...