Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WHAT SAY YOU


Bluetooth
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

This is all you had to post.

 

Instead you went on a "diva like" rant about how you rather have Hopkins, but I could have sworn you said you didn't want him either. But now since it's a bigger diva in Diggs you rather have the lesser diva Hopkins even if Diggs is more productive.smh

 

tukadiva21 cmon my guy.

I don't want Hopkins this year, but between the two he's the one I'd take because I think him being on the team only hurts the development of our young WRs, where Diggs would hurt the development of our young QB (along with the WRs), which would make it a non-starter for me.

I've also never once said Hopkins is a diva, because I don't think he is one.  So it's not about taking the lesser diva between them.

It's also not even about him being a diva, that's manageable, it's the way he acts like a diva, losing his mind on the sideline like he frequently did last year.  Combine that with him this offseason saying he should have a say in play calling and such, he's just a disaster waiting to happen if paired with a rookie QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Im tired of getting poo'd for suggesting every #1 WR that becomes available so im just going to fit in with everyone else.

 

Hard pass. He will limit the growth of our young potential star WR's in TMJ and Mingo.

 

 

 

Ah, playing the victim. "That's a bold strategy Cotton. let's see if it works for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I don't want Hopkins this year, but between the two he's the one I'd take because I think him being on the team only hurts the development of our young WRs, where Diggs would hurt the development of our young QB (along with the WRs), which would make it a non-starter for me.

I've also never once said Hopkins is a diva, because I don't think he is one.  So it's not about taking the lesser diva between them.

It's also not even about him being a diva, that's manageable, it's the way he acts like a diva, losing his mind on the sideline like he frequently did last year.  Combine that with him this offseason saying he should have a say in play calling and such, he's just a disaster waiting to happen if paired with a rookie QB.

Diggs just wants to be in the spotlight. He wants the most targets he wants the most catches.

I have suggested #1 WR's all offseason, but Diggs is the first one were I would legit decline. That dude screams "me first". No thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

Ah, playing the victim. "That's a bold strategy Cotton. let's see if it works for him.

Im dead serious. Im not a fan of Diggs. If there is a diva WR left in the NFL he is the closest one by far. He is all about his touches. Dude really was beefing with the Bills because he wasn't involved more in the offense.lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Im tired of getting poo'd for suggesting every #1 WR that becomes available so im just going to fit in with everyone else.

 

Hard pass. He will limit the growth of our young potential star WR's in TMJ and Mingo.

 

 

Dont agree with your wanting a #1 WR currently but have never poo'd on you. I just usually respond with a dumb meme to get under your skin but all in good fun my way my brotha!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Ricky Prickles said:

Dont agree with your wanting a #1 WR currently but have never poo'd on you. I just usually respond with a dumb meme to get under your skin but all in good fun my way my brotha!

Oh I know. I was joking btw. I don't care about no damn poo emojis especially when it comes from the same people everyday lol.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

If Hopkins had been cut before we signed Theilen it would have been a very interesting conversation to be had. 

Nah we 100% would have went after Hopkins hard.

 

During that time we had nothing but TMJ and practice squad WR's on the depth chart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only 4 receivers had more targets than Diggs last year. If he’s unhappy with that then I’d shudder to think how pissed off he’d be here in an offense that will spread the ball around a lot.

And selfishly I don’t want any more receivers because I’ve drafted TMJ in all my fantasy leagues, I’m going to stay believing that he’ll break out.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

If Hopkins had been cut before we signed Theilen it would have been a very interesting conversation to be had. 

Not Thielen, Chark

Hopkins and Thielen barely play the same position, Hopkins is an outside WR while at this point in his career, Thielen is basically just a slot guy (or at least mainly will be for us).

I'd have loved for us to be lining up Hopkins and TMJ on the outside with Thielen in the slot and Mingo getting snaps at each spot backing them up as well as the other slot in 4 wide sets.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...