Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rotoworld blurb on Terrace Marshall: “sneaky” fantasy upside


Recommended Posts

We'll see who the WR1 is. 

The thoughts on the D resonated with me.  We are "a couple injuries away from nightmare status".

The D was NOT good last year.  We invested little in it, player wise, and are moving to a new scheme.  We have an offensive minded HC so that is what is getting the love.  D feels like an after thought at ATM.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, poundaway said:

We'll see who the WR1 is. 

The thoughts on the D resonated with me.  We are "a couple injuries away from nightmare status".

The D was NOT good last year.  We invested little in it, player wise, and are moving to a new scheme.  We have an offensive minded HC so that is what is getting the love.  D feels like an after thought at ATM.

Brian Burns will soon be one of the league's highest paid defenders. And we've paid our new DC who was highly sought after handsomely to oversee the group. That doesn't really sound like an afterthought. I do think the pendulum is swinging more balanced as this team has heavily leaned into a defensive identity over many years. But let's be blunt. What do we have to show for it? Change is not a bad thing. We'll have to see how this approach looks big picture in a year or two.

Edited by frankw
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Icege said:

There was 1,442 total snaps under Matt Rhule's regime and 723 under Steve Wilks'. TMJ was on the field for 30.6% of the snaps under Rhule, 81.3% under Wilks. It is very much so accurate to state that TMJ was "hardly on the field" while Rhule was running the team. 

TMJ's averages per game from his 15 games under Rhule:

  • 29.4 snaps (441 total)
  • 19.8 routes  (297 total)
  • 2.3 targets (34 total)

TMJ's averages per game from his 12 games under Wilks':

  • 49 snaps (588 total)
  • 22 routes (264 total)
  • 3.6 targets (43 total)

To put those numbers into perspective, here are the averages for the other two WRs mentioned under Rhule:

Chosen (22 games)

  • 53.9 snaps (1185 total)
  • 36.9 routes (812 total)
  • 5 targets (110 total)

DJ (20 games)

  • 55.6 snaps (1112 total)
  • 36.2 routes (723 total)
  • 9.1 targets (182 total)

I agree that the coaching and QB situation were a dumpster fire.  

A rookie from the bottom of the second round, coming off an injury in college that sidelined him an entire year where he was WR#3 to begin with, is not going to be a barn burner and take snaps from two 1k NFL WRs out of the gate in a season that itself had  injury.    He was going to be eased in on any team, even DJ's worst season was his rookie and  his yards jumped 50% from rookie to sophomore season.

TMJ's drop rate was over 6% last year.  Hopefully that will improve.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, frankw said:

Brian Burns will soon be one of the league's highest paid defenders. And we've paid our new DC who was highly sought after handsomely to oversee the group. That doesn't really sound like an afterthought. I do think the pendulum is swinging more balanced as this team has heavily leaned into a defensive identity over many years. But let's be blunt. What do we have to show for it? Change is not a bad thing. We'll have to see how this approach looks big picture in a year or two.

As I said, we have invested little in the D "player-wise".  Yes Evero was a great grab.  We will see how much of Denver D was the players and how much was Evero.

We actually haven't signed a contract with Burns. As I said.  Afterthought. The Brian Burns contract should have been sewed up by now.  He now holds all the cards as we passed up attractive offers.

We didn't draft D until the bottom of the 3rd for, what many analysts and fans here consider to be an older player who "needs development".



 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am expecting what Tepper meant by spending on the D (while at the draft) had to do with paying Burns.  
I don’t understand the strong optimism for the D either, seems like some people are expecting the Steel Curtain. In.the.first.year.of transitioning to the 3-4.
Everyone seems to think these players are interchangeable in some of these positions. I am very wary of what we have inside up the middle, 1st and 2nd level, both. And then the CBs are questionable too, depth wise. At least we probably get to play Baker once. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Icege said:

There was 1,442 total snaps under Matt Rhule's regime and 723 under Steve Wilks'. TMJ was on the field for 30.6% of the snaps under Rhule, 81.3% under Wilks. It is very much so accurate to state that TMJ was "hardly on the field" while Rhule was running the team. 

TMJ's averages per game from his 15 games under Rhule:

  • 29.4 snaps (441 total)
  • 19.8 routes  (297 total)
  • 2.3 targets (34 total)

TMJ's averages per game from his 12 games under Wilks':

  • 49 snaps (588 total)
  • 22 routes (264 total)
  • 3.6 targets (43 total)

To put those numbers into perspective, here are the averages for the other two WRs mentioned under Rhule:

Chosen (22 games)

  • 53.9 snaps (1185 total)
  • 36.9 routes (812 total)
  • 5 targets (110 total)

DJ (20 games)

  • 55.6 snaps (1112 total)
  • 36.2 routes (723 total)
  • 9.1 targets (182 total)

Under Rhule, TMJ was WR3, behind DJ and Anderson and he played 1 actual game under Rhule in 2022. Anderson was traded one game after Rhule was gone. Who cares, that wasn’t the assertion. Also, your 30% under Rhule is very misleading because of all the missed games. Go to PFR and in 2021, it’s says he got 48% of snaps but he missed 4 games. In 2022, he only had one full game under Rhule.

When TMJ was in the game, he got WR3 snaps (just under half) with Anderson and when he was WR2 without Anderson he got 85%+ except for 1 game. That’s plenty of snaps and not much production. He was playing almost the entire game under Wilks yet he had 3 or less targets in 8 of 11 games.

I stand on my thought that Mingo has a much better shot IMHO to emerge as the top WR than Marshall.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, poundaway said:

We'll see who the WR1 is. 

The thoughts on the D resonated with me.  We are "a couple injuries away from nightmare status".

The D was NOT good last year.  We invested little in it, player wise, and are moving to a new scheme.  We have an offensive minded HC so that is what is getting the love.  D feels like an after thought at ATM.

I got smacked for saying injuries could happen but man, that’s got me worried as heck. We are paper thin and last year we were relatively healthy. We had one key injury at the end of the year with Horn and our pass D fell apart. Our pass rush falls apart without Burns. Our interior DL sucks without Brown. We are one injury away at tackle from Erving being a starter. We already are thin with Corbetts injury and then you are Mays and Erving away from guys I’ve never heard of starting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/31/2023 at 6:36 PM, electro's horse said:

Rotoworld (I’m never calling it sportsEDGE) is primarily a fantasy sports analysis site and they’re just basing this off Mike Kaye. 
 

but still it’s may and you know you’re starving for content 

Panthers beat writer Mike Kaye believes Terrace Marshall is "on the cusp of a breakout campaign."

After a down rookie season in 2021, Marshall would post a 28-490-1 line in his second season while averaging 17.5 YPR. The former second-round pick is expected to compete for a starting role with rookie Jonathan Mingo this offseason. Still, Kaye believes Marshall will ultimately "out-snap and out-produce his rookie counterpart" this season. Under a new head coach in Frank Reich, and with Bryce Young now under center, Marshall could have some sneaky upside in fantasy. He's currently going in the the final rounds of fantasy football drafts

I have been saying this all along--he was "breaking out" since Chosen Robbyie left.   I expect him to have between 600 and 700 yards this season while Chark and Thelein combine for about 2000.  Shenault is going to be the interesting player because they are going DEBO with him to some degree--the most misused player on the roster last year.  Throw in Mingo, and our WR corps has never been potentially this good at the top 5 positions. 

WRs can get tired--they run a lot of sprints in a game--having 5 over 3 is huge.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • While we're talking a fresh prospect that I happen to be a fan of, might as well get on a soapbox: Point 1 - He is not undersized by any means, his length is far above the mean His wingspan is in like the 85th percentile. An interesting note - his wingspan is 5 inches over Khalil Mack, 2 inches over Will Anderson's.  Only 1/2 inch away from the no-production yet size hyped 6'5 267 Shemar Stewart's. For comp - Ez's is around 83", arm length 34".  For NFL comp, the mean for wingspan is 80" and arms 33.5" at for starting EDGE defenders.  So it's not just my isolated comparisons. Point 2 - He isn't just a flashy "pass rush specialist" His film (and testing) shows elite quickness, hand work, and ability to play with the heads of OTs that normal prospects don't grasp. (see my prior post) Testing wise, one of the fastest 3-cones and short shuttles for an edge in years.  Fastest this year for both -- and those two drills are the ones teams look at for pass rushers, usually very indicative of success.  His quickness is off the charts. He's a guy that played well, showed well to those casually watching and those film-studying.  Then he goes out and tests well to back it up.  Apparently interviews super well.  So, I think it's all about his capacity/potential as a run defender.  That's really what it comes down to.  Can he be a 3-down guy or is he a specialist?  I see a 3-downer, his run defense is better than given credit for. A breakdown Ez vs. the NFL mean Arm Length: 34" vs. 33.5" (over) Wingspan: 83" vs. 80" (over) 3-Cone: 6.94 sec vs. 7.23 (WELL over, 95 percentile) Short Shuttle: 4.19 vs. 4.424 (over) Height: 6'2 1/2 vs. 6'3 (slight under) People look at the height a smidge under 6'3 and take that without considering the rest.   I think with Ez, it all comes down to what teams think his run defense upside is.  All it takes is one team - if they think he can become more that a passing down guy, then he could go high.  But if guys like Nik Bonitto and Haason Reddick can turn into these all-arounders, I don't see why this kid can't either who has higher pedigree and better measurables. Now, I prefer Graham, Walker inside, Will Johnson, Barron, and some others over him, but once we're in this tier outside of the top guys, I find the argument way more compelling for Ez over a Mykel Williams or Shemar Stewart.    
    • Well if we’re bringing this guy with character issues in for a visit why not consider Mike Green at 8!? 
×
×
  • Create New...