Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

“Ball Placement Specialist”


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm never a fan of using completion percentage as your primary measure of accuracy. They're just too many factors that can skew it one way or another.

I know it's not really possible for a fan to do this on a large scale, but if you want to judge accuracy the best way is just to watch a guy's throwing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm never a fan of using completion percentage as your primary measure of accuracy. They're just too many factors that can skew it one way or another.

I know it's not really possible for a fan to do this on a large scale, but if you want to judge accuracy the best way is just to watch a guy's throwing.

This wasn’t a completion pct

 

its a on target aka ball placement pct.

how often he hit the guy perfectly, catch or dropped

Edited by ncfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ncfan said:

This wasn’t a completion pct

 

its a on target aka ball placement pct.

how often he hit the guy perfectly, catch or dropped

I would have to assume he knew that Will Levis did not have an 89% completion percentage lol

Edited by therealmjl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ncfan said:

This wasn’t a completion pct

its a on target aka ball placement pct.

how often he hit the guy perfectly, catch or dropped

Gotcha. I didn't look that hard at the numbers.

8 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

I would have to assume he knew that Will Levis did not have an 89% completion percentage lol

You're correct...sort of. I wasn't really looking that closely 😃

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed. A healthy bit from column A (stats) and column B (film) paints the most accurate picture, which is currently that Bryce is not performing up to the standard a 1st round QB (let alone drafted #1 overall) is expected to (statistically). When we dig into the film to see why, we see that while he's having his struggles (not stepping up in the pocket, bailing out early, hesitating on some throws, making occasional bad reads, etc) the team that surrounded him last season was simply awful. Bottom 5 defense, bottom 5 OL, bottom 5 weapons... but somehow one player has to overcome ALL of that in their rookie season? Yeesh... Taking this season into consideration, he started where he left off last season and was rightfully benched. Since starting again, the team has gotten on its first winning streak in a few years and he's made good plays to keep them in the game. Is he lighting it up? Nah... but he is beginning to show the reason so many draftniks had him as QB1a for his class. Re: what the team does next season... who friggin knows anymore at this point T_T. Resign Dalton? Sign Jones? Draft somebody in the mid-to-late rounds? Go with another UFA? Maybe grab an FA that can compete with Bryce for the starting position and draft a rookie to sit and develop? Might be best of both worlds for the team, but ugh... not a fun position to still be in with question marks throughout the position group.
    • Yeah, this is basically the same as asking, "What if Bryce Young suddenly had Patrick Mahomes brain, how would he do?" It isn't happening. This ship is beyond sailed. Send him somewhere else, let us move on and him move on. 
    • Dalton is too close to starting right now. If it hadn't been for a car accident, he still would be. Switching Dalton for Jones does nothing except reduce the backup's age by a decade. One is in his NFL prime, the other is almost in his NFL grave. Not a horrible move if you're trying to improve the team. We've got to get better as a team and a lateral move like that would improve the team. The problem isn't that he's close to starting. The problem is we have a GM that signed off on BY and didn't bring in any serious QB competition for camp, a HC that said yeah, he's my guy until BY poo the bed so bad he couldn't start him, and an offense that's limited because BY can't make all the throws a normal NFL QB can.  The problem isn't that Jones could be an improvement as a backup QB. The problem is he could be better than our "franchise" QB. 
×
×
  • Create New...