Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

An Albert Breer special: Panthers have explored moving back into 1st round for a pass rusher


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

image.png.a3a453362534eb1fb2f5c3e23757b89c.png

Would #114 get Chase Young?  You know he isn't going back there in '24?

If our second (#39) and our fourth (#114) got us Lucas Van Ness I'd consider it. He could be Watt level.

I'd honestly trade back with Miami if they'd listen.  Target a solid CB and zone in on Dereck Hall.  Offer our picks #39 and #145 for Miami's #51, #94, and #197

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, *FreeFua* said:

For someone who is the first to get up in their feelings when called out for sharing information they think they have it’s weird you’d take this route but you do you. 

im not even sure what you mean by that.  I was "punching the clock" meaning i was done with the convo and moving into draft mode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

For someone who is the first to get up in their feelings when called out for sharing information they think they have it’s weird you’d take this route but you do you. 

Ah.... actually i totally missed that.. ahah "broken clock"... "even a broken clock is right twice" .... maaaan that would have landed better. Lets go with that.

Season 4 Success GIF by The Office

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

im not even sure what you mean by that.  I was "punching the clock" meaning i was done with the convo and moving into draft mode.

I figured you were playing the broken clock is right twice a day 

Anyways let’s move on. We won’t agree on Chinn. I won’t fault them for moving him, you don’t agree, that’s completely fine. That’s why I come to this board, to have people counter what I think 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, *FreeFua* said:

I figured you were playing the broken clock is right twice a day 

Anyways let’s move on. We won’t agree on Chinn. I won’t fault them for moving him, you don’t agree, that’s completely fine. That’s why I come to this board, to have people counter what I think 

no worries. i missed a golden opportunity there, haha. i blame the mezcal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, BeenPounding said:

image.png.a3a453362534eb1fb2f5c3e23757b89c.png

Would #114 get Chase Young?  You know he isn't going back there in '24?

If our second (#39) and our fourth (#114) got us Lucas Van Ness I'd consider it. He could be Watt level.

I'd honestly trade back with Miami if they'd listen.  Target a solid CB and zone in on Dereck Hall.  Offer our picks #39 and #145 for Miami's #51, #94, and #197

I would trade #114 for Chase Young in a heartbeat. If he somehow stays healthy we strike gold. His talent is not the problem. Maybe he needs new trainers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BeenPounding said:

image.png.a3a453362534eb1fb2f5c3e23757b89c.png

Would #114 get Chase Young?  You know he isn't going back there in '24?

If our second (#39) and our fourth (#114) got us Lucas Van Ness I'd consider it. He could be Watt level.

I'd honestly trade back with Miami if they'd listen.  Target a solid CB and zone in on Dereck Hall.  Offer our picks #39 and #145 for Miami's #51, #94, and #197

Call and ask. Worst thing they can say is no. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BeenPounding said:

image.png.a3a453362534eb1fb2f5c3e23757b89c.png

Would #114 get Chase Young?  You know he isn't going back there in '24?

If our second (#39) and our fourth (#114) got us Lucas Van Ness I'd consider it. He could be Watt level.

I'd honestly trade back with Miami if they'd listen.  Target a solid CB and zone in on Dereck Hall.  Offer our picks #39 and #145 for Miami's #51, #94, and #197

Washington isnt trading Chase Young lol

They're making him prove hes not a bust before they give him a big contract, but if he plays well they'll pay up for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...