Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Anthony Richardson was Panthers QB #2

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

carpanfan96 Veteran

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, The Crown and the Claw said:

This is just not true and based on the amount of content that I think can/will come out you all will see that soon

I believe you and I know that Bryce is the pick, but I find it strange that an old school coaching staff and front office would want a 5-10, 175 ilb qb at #1 overall. Doesn't make any damn sense at all. 

 

If he was 5-10 and stocky that's a different story, but when he's at his playing weight, that's just scary in the NFL. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, The Crown and the Claw said:

This is just not true and based on the amount of content that I think can/will come out you all will see that soon

Fitterer and Reich have repeatedly made it clear that the pick is their call.

I know some folks don't wanna buy it but I've seen no real evidence that it's otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, carpanfan96 said:

I find it strange that an old school coaching staff and front office would want a 5-10, 175 ilb qb at #1 overall. Doesn't make any damn sense at all. 

You find it strange because that's all you see ...a 5'10, 175lb QB. That's the problem. You cannot/will not see anything beyond that.

 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
KatsAzz Grand Master

KatsAzz

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, carpanfan96 said:

I believe you and I know that Bryce is the pick, but I find it strange that an old school coaching staff and front office would want a 5-10, 175 ilb qb at #1 overall. Doesn't make any damn sense at all. 

 

If he was 5-10 and stocky that's a different story, but when he's at his playing weight, that's just scary in the NFL. 

Please read the following article and it might relieve you from thinking that Bryce Youngs size will be a major problem in the NFL.

https://www.the33rdteam.com/category/nfl-draft/why-bryce-young-can-transcend-size-concerns-be-top-qb-in-2023-draft/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Veteran

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, KatsAzz said:

Please read the following article and it might relieve you from thinking that Bryce Youngs size will be a major problem in the NFL.

https://www.the33rdteam.com/category/nfl-draft/why-bryce-young-can-transcend-size-concerns-be-top-qb-in-2023-draft/

 

If he actually was 200ish, It wouldn't be a problem but he isn't 200ish.. 

 

Heck he's not even 190ish like Alabama had him, he played between 170-180 and was 185 at the most. 

I know he's got all the tools as a qb, but his frame (not his height) is a major freaking issue. 

 

Murray, Wilson, Brees were all legit 210-220lb framed qb's. 

 

Young has a frame where maybe he can get to what Alabama had him listed at in a healthy way

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KatsAzz Grand Master

KatsAzz

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

If he actually was 200ish, It wouldn't be a problem but he isn't 200ish.. 

 

Heck he's not even 190ish like Alabama had him, he played between 170-180 and was 185 at the most. 

I know he's got all the tools as a qb, but his frame (not his height) is a major freaking issue. 

 

Murray, Wilson, Brees were all legit 210-220lb framed qb's. 

 

Young has a frame where maybe he can get to what Alabama had him listed at in a healthy way

While we can’t remove the size element of  Bryce Young’s evaluation, I feel there's enough positives to make his height and frame just a part of who he is as a QB, not what defines him. 

Edited by KatsAzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Veteran

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Aside from his height and size, Bryce has literally everything you want out of a QB draft prospect. Richardson is literally the exact opposite. Bryce was the right choice. 

Bryce led this draft class in generated pressure (pressure the qb is responsible for) 

Outside of his frame, that's the biggest worry next level. 

 

If he gets his weight up and it doesn't impact his Athleticism much or any then size isn't really a concern.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Veteran

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, KatsAzz said:

While we can’t remove the size element of  Bryce Young’s evaluation, I feel there's enough positives to make his height and frame just a part of who he is as a QB, not what defines him. 

It might seem like I hate the pick, I actually don't hate the pick at all. Just super concerned about his size buy hopefully he is successful and becomes the exception to the rule

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      Chiefs vs Panthers

      By strato · Posted

      For the silly people that worship her it will be that.  The Coleman 'legend' thing, they did that with another fairly average player that was here and I sort of mocked or questioned the 'legend' status. Instantly caught crap for insulting someone's favorite Panther. So okay, Kurt Coleman is a Legend. 
    • MHS831
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By MHS831 · Posted

      You allow him to compete--you all are talking as if I am proposing making him the starter. Give him a new coach, new weapons, good OL, etc. and see what happens. You are saying, "Well Damn.  It did not work for 3 guys..."  Right now, our C is injured, we lost our top 2 WRs.  Better question:  If you need a QB, Why would you not take a chance on bringing in a QB who was a former first rounder, a good arm, intelligence, mobility, youth, etc.  and see how he does out of NY--with a better OL, better running game, better receivers.  I am not saying give him a 10-year contract, I am saying give him a chance. You act like there is no improvement on offense here--it was a 2 year process, and next year is year 2.  To me, how can you sit there with Bryce and an opportunity to sign a veteran QB on the cheap comes available and you say--"Not us. We're good.  We are waiting for Patrick Mahommes."  Jone's problem is obviously mental--and he has little support.  Why is this so frigging hard to comprehend.  It is called "bottom fishing" and it is better than sitting in the boat.  
    • TheSpecialJuan
      Predictions for Brooks debut

      By TheSpecialJuan · Posted

      I think we're going to fall from behind quite early and be forced to abandon the run game.  3 rushes -2 yards 1 catch -10 yards 
×
×
  • Create New...