Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A quick reminder for those of you who believe in after draft “Grades”

WarPanthers89

By WarPanthers89,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

WarPanthers89 Grand Master

WarPanthers89

Posted
Posted (edited)

This is a good reminder to some of you you who like listening to the talking heads who give draft grades right after a player is selected, where they get extremely emotional and are screaming opinions like it is the gospel. I can already see multiple threads around the horizon from trolls who will disagree with a pick, and will go straight to “after draft grade” as evidence showing why they are right. Here is a good example of a draft Fitty had a heavy hand in: 

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTRTcNhSo/

IMG_8856.jpeg

IMG_8858.jpeg

Edited by WarPanthers89
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pejorative Miscreant Grand Master

Pejorative Miscreant

Posted
Posted

I think draft grades are highly subjective and pretty much all of them should be TBD.  It’s all speculation followed by selective memory of “ I told you this guy was going to be good” while not remembering the 20 other guys you wanted that busted out. 

I enjoy reading draft grades but mostly for entertainment value. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

I think draft grades are highly subjective and pretty much all of them should be TBD.  It’s all speculation followed by selective memory of “ I told you this guy was going to be good” while not remembering the 20 other guys you wanted that busted out. 

I enjoy reading draft grades but mostly for entertainment value. 

The post season re-drafts are always funny. Maybe like 2 picks in the top 15 stick as the right option, and even then it's just assuming the failure/success would be equal with each teams coaching staff and playing schedule. Chinn is a good example of should have gone higher, then looked mediocre out of position, to now looking like how does he even fit in a 3-4

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, shaqattaq said:

2019 D+. Without Burns...a complete shitshow and a waste of a draft.

Little, Grier, whatever the name of that defensive back was that didn't do sh-t... Yikes 😬

Fairly safe to say nobody's missing Marty right now.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • jfra78
      Tyler Warren

      By jfra78 · Posted

      2023 was under Canales 2024 wasnt
    • MHS831
      Let's trade Moton

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I think that had his knees been in good shape, he would have been extended by now.  My opinion is based on the fact that they do not to seem very confident about his knees, so should we?  On the other hand, all veterans are playing with some chronic injury of some sort, so how much weight do you give it?  And in today's market, Moton's salary is not overblown.  Unless your concern becomes a problem, you stay the course, I would think.  But Moton will probably not be our tackle when we are a playoff team, so the time to start grooming his successor is probably this year.
    • Bear Hands
      Top insider Tony Pauline 2-round mock draft (Panthers love Mykel Williams and will take him)

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      The Athletic FS had a Panthers fan write in about Mykel vs Jalon. Derrick K was surprisingly in favor of Mykel but gave a pretty compelling argument. You’re getting a baseline great run defender with some nice pass rush potential. You’re not getting the hyper athletic, violent, burst off the snap type, but he’s a grinder who can maintain a great level of play throughout a game. He’s the ideal type to eventually have paired with the more peppy/athletic edge rusher. No one says to avoid a 1B just because you don’t have or can’t find a 1A. And who knows, he could still become a double digit sack guy. 86” wingspan is monster. With Jalon, you’re using him as an EDGE. So you’re banking him fitting a super rare spot, that only Parsons has really followed through at. Myles Jack and others just didn’t work out as well. They mentioned you may just be getting a shorter Luvu-plus rather than a Parsons-lite.  Mykel at 8 will not surprise me in the least, and it could be a solid move.
×
×
  • Create New...