Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will Levis #1 to the Panthers Confirmed


tukafan21
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I've never heard of him outside of seeing occasional tweets. If I had to guess, I'd say he's a parody account.

Yes, a parody account.  Alternately, you can think of his posts as a Rorschach test; you'll see what you want to believe is true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WarPanthers89 said:

The onion of the mock draft world. Again I am glad I am not a Mod on this board. This post would be instant ban. No laughing from me but I’ll still pie you anyway
 

the voice ban GIF

i'm considering asking the other mods to implement some sort of VIP SuperPoster status to give OP for this great thread

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I've never heard of him outside of seeing occasional tweets. If I had to guess, I'd say he's a parody account.

he's actually not a parody, he sincerely holds his beliefs and there are signs that he does like his donations and affiliations. he just delivers his opinions in a trolly/outlandish sort of way for his own amusement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

^^^ Did a mod edit my post or does this site automatically change The Golden Calf of Bristol's name when you put it in a post?

(guess I'm about to find out when I hit enter here lol)

Yes. The Golden Calf of Bristol changes.  It's as funny as poo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, rodeo said:

he's actually not a parody, he sincerely holds his beliefs and there are signs that he does like his donations and affiliations. he just delivers his opinions in a trolly/outlandish sort of way for his own amusement.

I assumed Kong ago it was a parody. I didn't know it was in question 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Did I mention that he was on worse teams?  Yes.  Do QBs alone win games?  No.  Did Cam, on a much better team with some awesome defenses ever have 2 consecutive winning seasons?  No.  So now you are cherry picking,  If the overall stats are similar, you take a look at him.   I told you that you look at his skill set---but you wanted to tell me that he sucks and mentioned performance.  I just presented performance--and his numbers are very similar to Cam Newton's numbers--a player most call the best Panther QB ever--and I agree.  By the way, Fumbles are evidence of how bad his OL has been--so you are saying that a QB in a situation worse than Cam's who has stats and physical abilities very similar to Cam's should not be given a look when you have Bryce Young at QB?  You are going with that story because you simply talked your way into a corner and now you are trying to save face.  No good GM would do what you suggest because "he sucks."  Sorry, but the facts do not support you.  But no matter what eye-opening details I provide, there are some who are going to go their Google machines to try to find some reason to support an ignorant approach to developing the QB position.  You ignored the similarities to Cam and went cherry picking.  I know what you are doing--but I am only suggesting (as I have stated before) that we bring him in as one of three approaches to resolving the QB issue. Compete with Bryce and draft a QB. Basically, I am suggesting that Jones has the potential to replace Dalton and compete with Young.  He is a battered stock that could get better in a better situation--that is human nature.  Instead, I am called a Daniel Jones lover and superfan.  That is good debate--But a real sign of immature thinking is the inability to LOGICALLY consider alternative perspectives--which is actually a characteristic of intelligence.   
    • I don’t get this, I know that is the popular thought process but I just don’t think it’s true.  For instance head to head last year the ACC had a winning record against the SEC.  The SEC had a losing record in bowl games. This year so far the head to head is 2-3 SEC and that’s with a fluke Vandy win in week one.  I see the ACC taking another head to head winning season after next week.  The SEC is mostly hype with 3 good teams, in my opinion.  But to say any ACC team would get exposed I believe is a stretch 
    • What the hell?  How is presenting Cam's stats hating him?  The point is not to hate Cam, it is to show you how similar Jones is to him and why you take a look at him.  I mentioned Jones has the skill set to take a look--the response is, "look at his 5 years of performance."  So I compare him to the greatest QB in franchise history, and the stats are similar--while Jones was in a worse situation.  Now that is "hating?"  Come on.  This is a meritless, ignorant, personal attack because you are wrong.  Just stop it.  You all attack the poster when you have nothing.  So saying "we should consider a guy with similar stats and size to Cam Newton" is now hating Cam and making me a Jones super fan- that is just stupid.  
×
×
  • Create New...