Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Albert Breer's Annual Mock


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

I get the sentiment, but I'd also be okay with it if we got good and the rest just continued to suck 😄

yeah i guess that would be ok too. but i just love a good rivalry. it makes it busy being a mod dealing with all the trash talking from other teams, but still i love it. i'd be happy either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

yeah i guess that would be ok too. but i just love a good rivalry. it makes it busy being a mod dealing with all the trash talking from other teams, but still i love it. i'd be happy either way.

I love good football.

That fact has made it hard to be a Panthers fan over the last few years 😣

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I mean I guess it's possible Huston trades down. I have heard rumors floated that everyone wants to trade down but I've not heard any about another team wanting to trade up.

i don't think they trade the #2. they're keeping that one unless they trade to the colts. 

it's that #12 that has me curious. i think that they use their 2nd pick for a QB and use the 1st pick for BPA. they can move up from 12 to say 8 so they get their QB. i don't know. i'm just getting ready for anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:
So basically, we get the guy we wanted after massively trading up while everybody else gets one by just kinda sitting there.

Not sure I like how this plays out for us...

...and I'm probably not alone.

If a team sits tight and waits for a supposed Franchise QB to hopefully drop to them, as opposed to trading up to get their guy, that doesn't inspire a lot of confidence about their belief in those prospects.  If you think a guy is a franchise QB, you don't sit and wait and hope that he drops...you go get him.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rayzor said:

and Levis to the Colts just makes too much sense considering Irsay. i'm not budging on that one. 

and i'm preparing myself for Stroud to the Falcons. Could you imagine us with Young, AR with the Bucs, and Stroud with the Falcons? That actually could be a lot of fun.

Reminds me of the old days when the NFCSouth had four great QBs competing and a new division winner each season. It was crazy but never ever boring.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rayzor said:

i don't think they trade the #2. they're keeping that one unless they trade to the colts. 

it's that #12 that has me curious. i think that they use their 2nd pick for a QB and use the 1st pick for BPA. they can move up from 12 to say 8 so they get their QB. i don't know. i'm just getting ready for anything.

If you listen the mouth breathers on the networks they will not need to. Apparently there will be only 2 taken in the top 10, maybe 3. They think CJ and AR may be there for them at 12 unless the Titans trade up for AR. I saw that predict somewhere this morning. It was probably someone's mock draft prediction. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

If you listen the mouth breathers on the networks they will not need to. Apparently there will be only 2 taken in the top 10, maybe 3. They think CJ and AR may be there for them at 12 unless the Titans trade up for AR. I saw that predict somewhere this morning. It was probably someone's mock draft prediction. 

It's actually being predicted in a lot of places.

The perception that this year's quarterback class isn't all that great is definitely out there.

(might even say it's prevalent)

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's actually being predicted in a lot of places.

The perception that this year's quarterback class isn't all that great is definitely out there.

I tend to agree.  It's better than last years crop but it's not ideal.  They all have flaws that will take time to overcome. They all have great attributes that could help them succeed. It will come down to which is more dedicated to being their best and his supporting cast. I'm just glad it's not up to me.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not quite true...

Young has pretty much every quality that I prefer in a quarterback. The durability concerns scare me though.

That's why my preference is Stroud, but I'd also be pretty happy with Young as long as we can keep him upright.

That’s fair…I’m also concerned about the durability aspect but I just think beyond that he really doesn’t have any flaws so I’m willing to roll the dice. I also just think he’s a cut above all the other QBs…I’m not dogging out CJ I just think even with CJ he put out bad tape that BY simply doesn’t have. I’d be thrilled with CJ as well make no mistake but I believe we’re making the correct choice. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Breer isn't as in the business of doing mocks on a regular basis. He prefers to do just one close to the draft and vets his choices with personnel people.

What does he foresee for the quarterbacks? Obviously Bryce Young goes first overall to the Panthers because he's been saying that for a while.

The rest are listed below:

4. Colts - CJ Stroud

The Colts wind up getting CJ Stroud without moving up at all after the Texans and Cardinals take other positions. Mind you, Breer does believe the Cardinals could potentially deal their pick...to the nervous Colts. Same result.

12. Texans - Will Levis

Like the Colts, the Texans also get a quarterback without trading up. In this case it's Levis, who Breer acknowledges could also go to Indianapolis.

So whither Richardson?

19. Bucs - Anthony Richardson

To Tampa, who + having Baker Mayfield - can afford to sit him for a year while he adjusts to the NFL.

...

So basically, we get the guy we wanted after massively trading up while everybody else gets one by just kinda sitting there.

Not sure I like how this plays out for us...

...and I'm probably not alone.

Everybody else get 'one' but not necessarily THE one. All indications are the Texans wanted Bryce, also. It may still work out for them but they aren't getting their first choice and we are. I'm okay with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, CashNewton22 said:

That’s fair…I’m also concerned about the durability aspect but I just think beyond that he really doesn’t have any flaws so I’m willing to roll the dice. I also just think he’s a cut above all the other QBs…I’m not dogging out CJ I just think even with CJ he put out bad tape that BY simply doesn’t have. I’d be thrilled with CJ as well make no mistake but I believe we’re making the correct choice. 

There are a few who knock Young's arm strength, but that's not real high on my list of priorities.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Breer isn't as in the business of doing mocks on a regular basis. He prefers to do just one close to the draft and vets his choices with personnel people.

What does he foresee for the quarterbacks? Obviously Bryce Young goes first overall to the Panthers because he's been saying that for a while.

The rest are listed below:

4. Colts - CJ Stroud

The Colts wind up getting CJ Stroud without moving up at all after the Texans and Cardinals take other positions. Mind you, Breer does believe the Cardinals could potentially deal their pick...to the nervous Colts. Same result.

12. Texans - Will Levis

Like the Colts, the Texans also get a quarterback without trading up. In this case it's Levis, who Breer acknowledges could also go to Indianapolis.

So whither Richardson?

19. Bucs - Anthony Richardson

To Tampa, who + having Baker Mayfield - can afford to sit him for a year while he adjusts to the NFL.

...

So basically, we get the guy we wanted after massively trading up while everybody else gets one by just kinda sitting there.

Not sure I like how this plays out for us...

...and I'm probably not alone.

But if we hadn’t traded up, we probably don’t get the guy we want so the fact they get who they want without trading up is irrelevant. 

There is also a very good chance that the guy they wanted the most was the guy we took.

So I’m reality they didn’t get they guy they wanted by staying put, they got their second or third choice by staying put.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...