Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Islanders game 5 7pm


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, DavidEng said:

Aho just said in the interview “the guy probably was aiming for my face”. I wondered the same thing, how could you miss the net that wide and that high?

 

I misquoted Aho, in rewatching his interview he actually said “the guy was probably not aiming for my face” when talking about Engvall’s shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just like the Boston series last year I expect this to go 7 games. And also like last year, I think the canes get trashed in round 2 by the rangers or devils. Hard to see a team with such an anemic offense and tendency to play lazy doing much of anything going forward.

Edited by BIGH2001
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tend to disagree outside of moments on the we played hard aspect. We played really disjointed. Slavin was off, burns was off, Necas kept trying to get too fancy around the blue line. We let them poke check the puck on entry just enough to have a set play goal called back. Then they started pushing Noesen below the goal line. Overall, it didn’t really feel like a team effort. Get a couple days rest cause I suspect Raanta is going back in for game 6 knowing rod. Run drills on Thursday. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, DavidEng said:

I misquoted Aho, in rewatching his interview he actually said “the guy was probably not aiming for my face” when talking about Engvall’s shot.

Ummm he didn’t even shoot it on net. I think he was aiming for aho’s body but…

Also what was up with Raanta, he just froze when he saw Aho take the puck and the blood flow. This isn’t practice dude. Seal that short side off. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did think Slavin/Burns were off.  However, we carried play for a long stretch, and their first two goals were absolute flukes. And with the one we had that was disallowed/the bounce off Aho and the bounce off the boards to give them a breakaway/Staal not burying his early one--i just feel like a bounce here or there it would have been a different game. I think we'll close it out Friday.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, backINblack28 said:

I did think Slavin/Burns were off.  However, we carried play for a long stretch, and their first two goals were absolute flukes. And with the one we had that was disallowed/the bounce off Aho and the bounce off the boards to give them a breakaway/Staal not burying his early one--i just feel like a bounce here or there it would have been a different game. I think we'll close it out Friday.

You know Slavin is off if he lets the puck out of the zone from a pass more than once a game. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Harbingers said:

You know Slavin is off if he lets the puck out of the zone from a pass more than once a game. 

for sure. he looked tired and just not all there. but for me--to have our top D pairing play kinda trashy, AND be without three of our top 6 to not even count Drury---I feel like we were a bounce away. We're gonna go give them a handshake line in their own building. I'm okay with slaying those road demons in this series.  If literally nothing else, this playoffs slaying road demons is enough to take away from this playoffs along with the division banner to make a true 100% run at it next year with Svech/Patches and to step on the gas at trade deadline/do something big time at goalie

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There were a couple lapses, but there were a couple fluky goals for NY as well.

So, here's my take: If you put 36 shots on goal with a goalie who gives up rebounds like the Easter bunny gives up jelly beans, you gotta take advantage. The Isles play stay home defense around the net because they know 2 things: Sorokin will give up rebounds and the Canes have net front.

Canes need to cycle quicker and rotate 2 guys to the front of the crease. If given the opportunity, shoot the damn puck. If there's a lane, shoot it.

Raanta needs the extra day of rest. And now, with a 3-2 series, does RBA go with Freddie, knowing he'll give up and easy 1 or 2 goals and hope the Canes can repeat their 5-goal performance? Or do they stick with Raanta on 2 days rest? Personally, I'm not sure how committed Andersen is to the organization at this point. He's a UFA and has lost the crease to his backup. Not sure myself, just throwing it out there.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

There were a couple lapses, but there were a couple fluky goals for NY as well.

So, here's my take: If you put 36 shots on goal with a goalie who gives up rebounds like the Easter bunny gives up jelly beans, you gotta take advantage. The Isles play stay home defense around the net because they know 2 things: Sorokin will give up rebounds and the Canes have net front.

Canes need to cycle quicker and rotate 2 guys to the front of the crease. If given the opportunity, shoot the damn puck. If there's a lane, shoot it.

Raanta needs the extra day of rest. And now, with a 3-2 series, does RBA go with Freddie, knowing he'll give up and easy 1 or 2 goals and hope the Canes can repeat their 5-goal performance? Or do they stick with Raanta on 2 days rest? Personally, I'm not sure how committed Andersen is to the organization at this point. He's a UFA and has lost the crease to his backup. Not sure myself, just throwing it out there.

I agree, Andersen has checked out, and Raanta needs to rest and reset, put the rookie in for game 6 and hope for the best

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BIGH2001 said:

Just like the Boston series last year I expect this to go 7 games. And also like last year, I think the canes get trashed in round 2 by the rangers or devils. Hard to see a team with such an anemic offense and tendency to play lazy doing much of anything going forward.

There is no doubting they need to step it up if they plan on going anywhere.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He made some excellent throws but he always has made some excellent throws here and there. I don't know what to think, which is what I was apprehensive about. Is he going to have a decent downfield game? Because okay Legette dropped one, but someone was giving stats prior to the bye or during it where he had two downfield completions and one of them was the jump ball that is just launched and fingers are crossed that our guy comes down with it, and yesterday we saw that again. The Russell Wilson school of downfield passing.  I don't feel like that is sustainable, but at the same time you have to do Something to make the defense understand they have to defend that downfield throws. Like i said, confused.  I guess I'm going to review the game for myself and look closely at his mechanics and stuff because if he actually fixed that stuff it explains the better throws. And that has been my biggest objection, or what I see as the thing that makes or breaks his chances, that unorthodox dropback and tippy toe action and not having his feet set which limits velocity etc etc. 
    • The negative Nancy in me (or objective?) says that they had a bye week to prepare for the Chiefs. However, it’s one thing to have a good plan and it’s another to actually execute it. For all the flack he’s received (from me as well), Bryce seemingly has put his head down and worked his tail off and his play is giving me hope. The first 18-game Bryce showed no progression whatsoever. He gets benched, comes back, and has shown steady progress every week he has started. I think I’m starting to see what the Bryce lovers and unconditional defenders were saying all along, and I hope he can show that on a regular basis for the sake of our QB1 position. 
    • Yeah, we could still very well end up 4-13 with the 2nd pick.   I think LVR has the inside track for 1, with only a JAX team as a team on docket that could be beatable.    
×
×
  • Create New...