Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

*apparently false scores leaked* STROUD SCORES 18% ON S2 TEST (or maybe not)


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

This place will explode if they do not take Young.  They will sound like Jets fans with all the booing and predictions of failure for whoever is taken.  As much as I love Young I'm still not 100% sure he's the pick.

Not being a jerk, just being curious, why do you think he’s not the sure fire pick for us? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Castavar said:

I'm eager to see if this is the lowest S2 scored since they've introduced it. That seems absurdly low lol

 

It’s a percentile test. If the score is true it means 18 % of all football players that have taken the test has scored lower than him while 72% have scored higher. 

 

Cognitive test aren’t graded like a grade school test. 

Edited by Beast_3000
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Lobo said:

Not being a jerk, just being curious, why do you think he’s not the sure fire pick for us? 

Can't speak for snow, but I would say while Young is probably the pick, you never know until you hear the name read.

(that's why the draft always makes me nervous) 😣

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

and the s2 guys said all the qbs did well, somebody gots some explaining to do

What I thought too but I thought about it and what is he gonna say? “Well they all did pretty well except this one guy, I’m not sure how he wipes his ass or eats without assistance”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah. Very well could be leaked by the Texans or some other top team to prep their fanbase for passing on him. Who knows?

I don’t get why it’s a big deal that it is leaked to the public. The team’s already had the info, it’s not like it was hidden from them. This is just for us fans to have insight to why someone could/would drop.

 

cc: @vorbisbc this is a good topic for discussion 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the shtick with Bob McGinn's prospect rankings (which are VERY thorough and often go against conventional narratives in insightful ways) is that he polls scouts from all over the league, and grants them anonymity. he includes their thoughts verbatim in his rankings, where he puts prospects into tiers.

I think most of us can understand how the anonymity approach can be really interesting, but also how it can be weaponized or misused to rapidly change perceptions of a prospect in the week leading up to the draft. maybe the truth is being told, but maybe a team feels like if they can make a prospect slide on draft weekend, they can get a good deal out of it. the thing is, we just don't know which is which, thanks to the anonymity thing.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

and the s2 guys said all the qbs did well, somebody gots some explaining to do

My only thought on the S2 guy is if he was leaking bad scores it may look bad on him in terms of mass adoption of his product. Though they get leaked anyway clearly by the NFL teams, so probably irrelevant.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stan786 said:

My only thought on the S2 guy is if he was leaking bad scores it may look bad on him in terms of mass adoption of his product. Though they get leaked anyway clearly by the NFL teams, so probably irrelevant.

well now if its a true score of 18% the s2 dudes look kindof like buffoons

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't get the Hunter hate. Just imagine his ceiling if he stopped trying to be this 2way freak and focused on one side of the ball 
    • 100%.  You have to play the cards that are dealt.  Not the cards you wish were dealt.
    • I'd say its definitely going to be addressed this off-season.  We went into the last draft with a roster of RBs including:  Chubba, Blackshear, and Miles Sanders. We picked Jonathan Brooks in the second and still signed Rashaad Penny afterwards.  Fast forward....One turned into a top 10 back, 1 is injured/out for most if not all the '25 season, 1 retired, 1 will either take a huge paycut or be cut, and the last is a restricted free agent. We brought in Mike Boone as well. Add him to the free agent list also.  We need a physical option.    Which qualifies:  Ashton Jeanty(Boise St): Overall ranked Top 10. Almost 2k yards after contact, 28 tds. Would take our first rounder. My money would be on an NFC East team selecting him. (97.2 PFF run grade) - 121 forced missed tackles.  Omarion Hampton(UNC): Ranked everywhere from 20 - 59 overall. Consensus #2 back after Jeanty. He'll be a second rounder. 1,222 Yards after contact w/ 15 tds.  (90.5 PFF run grade) - 72 forced missed Tackles Kaleb Johnson(Iowa): Ranked from 38 - 69 depending on which media outlet you prefer but generally #3. 2nd/3rd possibly. 1,060 Yards after contact w/ 21 tds.(86.7 PFF run grade)- 66 forced missed tackles Cam Skattebo: Ranked from the 50's - 104. Every mock I do he ends up BPA at some point. 969 Yards after contact w/ 17 tds(92 PFF Run Grade). Probably the best receiving back of the group. 81 forced missed tackles.  If the '24 and '25 draft classes were combined, IMO the rankings would be, in order: Jeanty, Hampton, Brooks, Johnson, Skattebo. I wouldn't take one high but I'd take one for Chubba and Brooks insurance. 
×
×
  • Create New...