Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BH's Time Waster: Panthers Analysis & Full 2-Round Mock

Bear Hands

By Bear Hands,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Hoping to make this less just posting mocks my man.  Appreciate the responses though 

Sorry just a couple of examples on different simulations where I’ve been able to get by trading down in the 2nd.. Continue..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ricky Prickles Grand Master

Ricky Prickles

Posted
Posted

How about the giant TE out of Georgia in the second? If we are going to have a smaller QB maybe we could give him a Godzilla sized target? If he keeps his weight down and is aggressive he could be an unstoppable force in the red zone. If he were to catch onto the pro game fast we could have both he and Hurst as viable receiving options which could cut down on the need for a WR. Just thoughts as I think it would be interesting to pair the largest TE in the league with the smallest QB. never know, it could work out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I will say, the Falcons scenario in my mock is one I hope doesn't happen. This gives them Bijan, Downs, & K White.  They could put themselves in really nice position if someone wants to move up for Levis or AR (if they are available) at 8.  

Obvious candidates being HOU, TEN, & TB.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
  • Author
Posted
16 minutes ago, Ricky Prickles said:

How about the giant TE out of Georgia in the second? If we are going to have a smaller QB maybe we could give him a Godzilla sized target? If he keeps his weight down and is aggressive he could be an unstoppable force in the red zone. If he were to catch onto the pro game fast we could have both he and Hurst as viable receiving options which could cut down on the need for a WR. Just thoughts as I think it would be interesting to pair the largest TE in the league with the smallest QB. never know, it could work out!

I would have no problem with that if I didn't project him to Dallas at 26 in Round 1.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 hours ago, RenoCarolina said:

I just get the feeling that Hooker is moving ahead of Levis.

 

Also I'm sure you did a lot of research on that DET trade back but it sure doesn't look like they gave up enough to move up 11 spots.  I would be miffed.

I will say, I see Hooker fitting with a lot more teams than Levis right now so it could very well happen.  

Overall, even if there is some hesitation with Levis, I see ~TB/19 to MIN/24 is his floor for dropping.  Hooker could end up as high as the teens (to the Texans?) so Hooker could possibly go before. That being said, there's A LOT of rumors this time of year. 

I will say, anyone who saw that Bama-TEN game & watched Hooker progress year by year from his sophomore season at VT to last year at TEN should know what he's capable of.  Age be damned, if he can play, he can play.  He has great downfield placement, got the legs, size, even if the arm isn't Levis-level, he's got game.

My biggest BS meter goes off w/ the idea multiple QBs go in a row at the top.  This is not a class that goes 1-3.   

Fits:

Young - Panthers=as good as done

Stroud - Colts, Raiders

Richardson - Seahawks, Raiders, Vikings (Just don't see the Texans or Titans swinging for him)

Hooker - Raiders, Texans, Rams, Tampa Bay

Levis - Titans, Tampa Bay

my 2 cents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 hours ago, RenoCarolina said:

Also I'm sure you did a lot of research on that DET trade back but it sure doesn't look like they gave up enough to move up 11 spots.  I would be miffed.

Re: this comment 

I did check some stuff out and historic trades.  

It's s 9 spot move from 39 to 48. 

But where we gain is moving up 12 in the next round from 93 to 81 and them adding on a 5th to sweeten.

I think we could squeeze a 4th, but that'd give them a big gap mid-draft, so could be a 39+93 for 48+81 swap, and they add on a future/24' 3rd (highest I could see)   

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
  • Author
Posted

An added prospect fit that could happen per some reports/buzz:

Tucker Kraft & Sam LaPorta TE - Bengals, R2

They've hosted both and apparently are very high on them, potentially have their sights on them instead of Kincaid or Mayer at 28.  I don't think they need to force anything with their position in R1.  R1--I could see Gibbs (as mocked), DB, OL, or even DL if a rusher presents himself. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      Yeah and he succeeded at an even higher level in LA with an even better surrounding cast. Goff is a guy that isn't really able to dramatically elevate players around him but he can make a good situation even better. He is capable of that. Some QB's aren't. I am not sure Dak is able to do that and he is in a similar "class" as Goff, IMO.
    • rayzor
      Snow in the high country

      By rayzor · Posted

      i think i could handle that for a year. beyond that....i don't know.  back where we lived, when we had a few inches of snow, it might have been a couple feet because we weren't getting out and doing anything. i remember times where power would go out for days on end. we had propane and electric heat, depending on the floor. basement (had a couple bedrooms and a living room and kitchen down there) and main floor had gas logs. main floor gas logs was enough to take care of the upstairs, so we could stay warm and cook on the grill when we needed. we had a well so that was always an issue when the power went out. had to make sure tubs were filled with water for the toilets and we had gallons of water for drinking and cooking available. always had to make sure we were ready. that wasn't always the case. we had a couple moments where we were going through propane quickly and because we were dealing with the worst propane company in the world (amerigas) they wouldn't get out to put gas in our 900 gallon tank. made for some nerve racking moments.  i know y'all were probably a lot more able to handle that kind of thing, but after the little bit (comparatively) that we got here i just have no desire to get trapped again. maybe for a day or two a year get snowed in and i'm good.
    • kungfoodude
      We finally get to see Brooks this week

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I think he is just drawing a DC to them line and that's about as far as his thought process went. It makes almost no sense outside of that. Also, it doesn't make sense for Pittsburgh or Seattle at this juncture either.  I think our "veteran" pool is basically gonna be the Dalton/Flacco tier or the "pick your poison" options of young busts(Jones/Z. Wilson) or wild, TO prone gunslingers(Darnold/Winston/etc). We have the option to pursue I genuinely believe(depending on the way the rest of this season goes), we either draft a QB in the top 10 or resign Dalton. Outlier third option on taking one of the wild gunslingers that Dave feels like he can work with.
×
×
  • Create New...