Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PETER KING: Bryce Young is head and shoulders in the lead to be #1 pick

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, USDepartmentOfSavagery said:

I’m sure the FO with generations of scouting, playing, and coaching experience will take your concerns into consideration

don't you know we're voting on it, which is why it is so important to convince everyone else that they are idiots if they don't agree and vote with me!!!!!!!!

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
KatsAzz Grand Master

KatsAzz

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Fenrir said:

I think this is how the fanbase should look at it. We're in an absolute win-win scenario here...

I agree with you 100%. At first I was all aboard on the Panthers drafting Ohio State's C. J. Stroud because of his size  but after doing a lot of research I determined that Alabama's Bryce Young is at least his equal.

Both QB's have outstanding but different elite talents that I feel balance out, so it will probably come down to the system the Panthers want to install long term to determine which QB they select.

No matter which outstanding QB the Panthers select I feel it will be a win-win for them and the fans.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, rayzor said:

it seems like the big issue is Young's lack of bigness, but in every other facet it seems that Young is the better prospect and so the decision is whether or not Youngs many other boxes that he checks outweighs his lack of weight. it's looking like they are starting to come to the conclusion that he's big enough for the job. 

i've said for weeks, people in both camps need to get used to the idea that the guy they would rather not have will be the guy that we draft. find peace now. it's for your own good.

Thats been the issue from the jump with stroud a close second and hopefully he could be coached up to be a better pro.  The issue has never been is young the better guy its always been about the size.  You can coach and correct Strouds issues but youngs will be there his entire (short) career

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Fenrir said:

I think this is how the fanbase should look at it. We're in an absolute win-win scenario here...

absolutely. i hope we're never in this situation again, but since we're in it i don't think there's a better dilemma to have. whoever we pick, especially if it's either young or stroud, we can count on to be an absolute stud for years.

and if they think it's AR, then giddyup because if any coaching staff can take all that potential and help him reach it, it's us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TLGPanthersFan Grand Master

TLGPanthersFan

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, USDepartmentOfSavagery said:

I’m sure the FO with generations of scouting, playing, and coaching experience will take your concerns into consideration

Okay. Don’t know why you are being antagonistic since I wasn’t responding to anyone and was just voicing a thought on a forum I am free to do so. But you do you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TLGPanthersFan Grand Master

TLGPanthersFan

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, rayzor said:

don't you know we're voting on it, which is why it is so important to convince everyone else that they are idiots if they don't agree and vote with me!!!!!!!!

Literally had no sarcasm or animosity behind what I posted. I do not care, at this point, who we draft but I just posted a thought and get an unneeded sarcastic response. When I wasn’t even looking for a response. 

Edited by TLGPanthersFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Martin Grand Master

Martin

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Carl Spackler said:

Counterpoint: the fear of passing on what could be a game-changing QB (think 2009 Stephen Curry for basketball) could be even more real

No offense, but the Curry comparisons I see are terrible. Curry is a relatively tall PG at 6’3”. The major hesitations around him were never size related, it was his athleticism and level of competition. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Martin said:

No offense, but the Curry comparisons I see are terrible. Curry is a relatively tall PG at 6’3”. The major hesitations around him were never size related, it was his athleticism and level of competition. 

Yeah 6'3" PG's are common in the NBA, he's more like a Muggsy Bogues

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
USDepartmentOfSavagery Grand Master

USDepartmentOfSavagery

Posted
Posted (edited)
35 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Okay. Don’t know why you are being antagonistic since I wasn’t responding to anyone and was just voicing a thought on a forum I am free to do so. But you do you. 

Okay. I am voicing a thought about your thought on a forum as I am free to do. But you do you.

Edited by USDepartmentOfSavagery
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      We finally get to see Brooks this week

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I mean.....his guy has to be someone willing to come so Geno Smith is out. If you mean RUSSELL Wilson, that is laughable. Fields and ZACH Wilson are just basically the beginning of the end. These aren't likely to be Geno Smith turnarounds. Fields is further proving that he just isn't much more than a gimmick player. Zach Wilson still probably needs a year or two under some better circumstances before I would consider him a candidate for being a turnaround. He is just jumping straight back into the NY Jets fire here. 
    • kungfoodude
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      This is factually incorrect. He was a two time Pro Bowler with the Rams and in fact statistically he was better with the Rams in his best season there than he has been with the Lions(could change with this season). Some of his per game stats have creeped into being marginally better with the Lions but there have not been dramatic differences in his play, actually. The biggest reason that McVay and he ended up splitting was McVay didn't think he could win a title with Goff. TBH.....so far he was 100% correct. Stafford almost immediately won them a SB and Goff in a historic run was about 70% of the reason the Lions faltered in the NFC championship game. He missed critical throws all over the first half and throughout the second half that he normally wouldn't. He choked. So, until Goff actually does win a SB...McVay has been right.
    • rayzor
      We finally get to see Brooks this week

      By rayzor · Posted

      they have the best defense they've had in a long time...probably the best in the reid/mahommes era.  but i think they are probably the most beatable they've been in a while as well. record doesn't exactly bear that out, but they just don't look as strong on offense as they usually do. lots of reasons for that, like trying to build chemistry with newer receivers, but right now they just aren't as frightening as they typically are. i mean they'll probably win tomorrow, but i don't see them as the strongest team in the AFC right now. 
×
×
  • Create New...