Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WR in draft


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, mickeye76 said:

Unless the talent at 39 is just that special. Like. O Cyrus, Jack Campbell, Zay, BJ etc we could likely trade.  45 to 65 is a sneaky area that could be prime spot to add two valuable players instead of just one at 39.  

I think we could move back 10 spots or so if the price is right. We don't need a bunch of late rounders. I'm not seeing anyone with that capital to get 2 second rounders as is but I wouldn't be opposed to trading back and then trading back up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless they trade back, it is going to be an Edge. 

schooled tim meadows GIF by Sony Pictures Television

 

Disclaimer: Unless it's not.  I give edge a 50% chance, CB and G each 20% chances.  I see no WR who will be there at 39 much better than what is already on the roster now.

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

Unless they trade back, it is going to be an Edge. 

schooled tim meadows GIF by Sony Pictures Television

 

Disclaimer: Unless it's not.  I give edge a 50% chance, CB and G each 20% chances.  I see no WR who will be there at 39 much better than what is already on the roster now.

I was thinking the same.  Just ran a mock and the offensive talent available at 39 was crazy. Mayer, Washington, Kincaid, Zay, O Cyrus, and Gibbs all there.  Crazy.  I don't see that many dropping.  Instead of a run of defense that obviously happened in this mock or a run on offense that dwindles this enticing group.  I think it will be a 60/40 split.  Leaning towards mostly offense. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Karlaftis and Danna have been pretty inconsistent so teams have been doubling Jones and able to contain their pass rush.   But the good thing is that yesterday, we schemed well against Steve Spags Defense, Canales married the surrounding personnel with his QB through play designs within his comfort zone and was able to get downfield at will.  He was able to execute higher difficulty throws and look a lot more comfortable.  It tells me that Canales has a good system in mind, and had an edge gameplanning wise against Spagnuolo - which is nice to see.  It's a bit to see-saw at times with either going way too pass heavy or way too run heavy, but I think he's finding out what works.  It takes time to have it come together, and sure, I could see regression happen against a better front-7, but this was good for the entire system gelling.    
    • This was evident first two weeks of season. I don’t see any issues with physical tools since he came back. I think he is a player that must play with confidence to overcome those size limitations and he’s doing that.  
    • Still 3-10 on passes over 15 yards.  At least he's not scared to merely attempt them anymore.  Where I see improvement is the 10-15 yard range.  He was 6-6.  Bryce of old was scatter shot on anything beyond 10 yards and the further out, the worse the accuracy.
×
×
  • Create New...