Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

But Bryce Young did good on a test...right??

PanthersGOATFan336

By PanthersGOATFan336,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

WarPanthers89 Grand Master

WarPanthers89

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, PanthersGOATFan336 said:

This tape?

or this one

 

 

 

I don’t have the energy to point out to you why a cherry picked highlight tape or play is a bad counter point. This seems to be a situation that would be like arguing politics or religion with someone who has blinders on and can only see one side. I’ll say again though that both QB’s are extremely talented and that I will be happy with either one. I will trust our coaching staff which is one of the most experienced in the league with this choice and will be thrilled with whatever choice they make because they have a job and reputation on the line if they get it wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ncfan Grand Master

ncfan

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, PanthersGOATFan336 said:

It's gonna hurt so good

 

cj-stroud.gif

For you.

just please for the sake of all of us.

don’t spam the board like a child throwing a temper tantrum when the pick is in and it’s Bryce

Edited by ncfan
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
gmonjimbo Community Regular

gmonjimbo

Posted
Posted

There is no test or score with 100% accuracy that will predict if a QB will bust or not in the NFL. However, from what I'm reading the S2 score is more weighty than the wonderlic test and is another piece of the puzzle to evaluating prospects.

Bryce's high score and previous experience taking the test in high school - says a couple of things to me.

One, his high level of focus and preparation for the NFL. This correlates with Scott Fitterer saying Bryce mental approach is already at an NFL level and Saban describing him as an extra coach on the field this past season. 

Second, his instincts and feel for the game. His processing level on the test translates on the field. He has a good pre and post read understanding of what the defense is trying to do. It's different when you see a guy run a 4.3 at the combine, but on film looks like a 4.5 guy. Which makes the coach or scout take a second look at the tape

From what I've gathered Bryce has won on the film and tests like S2 and interviews confirm what is on the tape. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I wonder why Haener isn't getting more hype?  He is only 1 point behind him tied with Burrow.

I am a long time Haener stan but gotta be honest--his arm leaves a bit to be desired strength wise.  If Levis/AR are 95+, Bryce/CJ 90+, he's more like an 85.  I'd classify him well higher than a Cassel/Pennington.  He's just not a Round 1 level arm talent, then mix in a frame concern similar to Bryce. 

Really has everything else IMO.  His game is awesome, has a sense of layering throws, pocket work, pre-snap reads, crunch time work, & accuracy down more than most R1 level guys.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, PanthersGOATFan336 said:

Ever in the history IN 2021 sentence police

that doesnt make any sense though.... 2020 Burrow had higher.  You can't use the word "ever" and say in X period of time....  just admit the tweet was wrong.. why defend it so hard?

ev·er

at all times; always.

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Castavar Grand Master

Castavar

Posted
Posted (edited)

People need to slow their roll judging Justin Fields too early. Lamar Jackson looked like absolute trash his rookie year. Eagles fans were ready to move on from Jalen Hurts just a year ago. So Justin Fields' S2 could very well be proven right if he goes out there and balls out this year.

Edited by Castavar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • BullCityP
      What top 10 prospect do you absolutely NOT want?

      By BullCityP · Posted

      Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • tukafan21
      What top 10 prospect do you absolutely NOT want?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • BullCityP
      What top 10 prospect do you absolutely NOT want?

      By BullCityP · Posted

      Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...