Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Islanders Game 1 Monday


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Day1PanthersFan said:

Yeah, I started out watching ESPN but it was obvious how little they cared about our game, I switched it to the local broadcast, chip and the gang are so refreshing compared to the zombies on ESPN 

WTF is Chip and Gang? 

😂🤣😂🤣😂

Post of the night, get Chip and the Gang for the next broadcast too.....

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Anybodyhome said:

Mayfield laying on top of Stepan long after the whistle.

This was a common tactic last night. I assume to stop us cycling. But it was definitely ridiculous, at some point you gotta call it something. It happened at least a dozen times. Luckily we didn’t let it get to us. 
 

Also wtf was up with the islanders sticks, those things were breaking left and right.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So here’s my recap.

What I liked: Our level of physicality, finishing hits. PP1 Unit. Raanta, especially his tracking of long pucks.

What I didn’t like: Not finding the net 5v5 especially with a poo ton of high dangers. Our defense collapsing in the first period around Raanta. We usually don’t play house. 
 

We need to make these high dangers goals vs. good goalies, if we can do that the sky’s the limit. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Fink article on thehockeywriters site about the game is biased BS.

The Islanders outplayed the Hurricanes for the majority of the game and outscored them in even-strength play.”

I left a comment:

“You say the Islanders outplayed the Hurricanes? Laughable, the stats prove otherwise. Canes SOG 37 to Islanders 26. Canes won the faceoffs. Canes 2/4 on the PP to Isles 0/4.

Less bias and more facts in your next article please.”

Please feel free to comment if you want, sign up not required-

https://thehockeywriters.com/islanders-loss-hurricanes-04-17-2023/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, DavidEng said:

Mike Fink article on thehockeywriters site about the game is biased BS.

The Islanders outplayed the Hurricanes for the majority of the game and outscored them in even-strength play.”

I left a comment:

“You say the Islanders outplayed the Hurricanes? Laughable, the stats prove otherwise. Canes SOG 37 to Islanders 26. Canes won the faceoffs. Canes 2/4 on the PP to Isles 0/4.

Less bias and more facts in your next article please.”

Please feel free to comment if you want, sign up not required-

https://thehockeywriters.com/islanders-loss-hurricanes-04-17-2023/

Who? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

You had a enough time to sign up for some random account and comment on it but won’t send one of our own a link?

I included a link to the article. I didn’t have to sign up as I stated in my post.

He is a writer for the site I linked to and covers the Islanders hockey. Hope that helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It amuses me how Goff's name the last few years is often used to compare to subpar or underperforming QB's. Now on the surface I get it. But when you look at his numbers he's been the same QB all along. He's improved his completion % but even with the Rams he averaged 63.4. And that Super Bowl he played in they should have won honestly. If we can get a QB as good as Goff I'll be pretty damn pleased.
    • And it remains to be seen if Goff has that ability or not. Plenty of very good QB's like Goff were not able to get over those playoff humps. Matt Ryan, Kirk Cousins, etc. You can still be an upper tier QB and never get over that hurdle. McVay just thought(and hasn't been wrong yet) Goff was never going to be that guy.
    • You literally simply have to think logically for either of those guys. Smith is locked up on a deal for 2025, so we would have to trade for him or he gets cut. Neither of those scenarios are likely in the first place.  Wilson will be 37 in 2025. Why on earth would he have any interest in a situation that is far worse than he was given in Denver and wasn't able to win there? He's a guy that can drop into any ready to win franchise in the NFL and immediately elevate their chances of winning(provided they already have QB issues).  Frankly, that is either speculation that even David Newton should be embarrassed by or it shows how disconnected with reality some people in our organization are.   I do agree with him on getting a veteran QB, however. That's our best chance to keep developing our talent.
×
×
  • Create New...