Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did the S2 TEST take CJ out?


Ivory Panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Carolina Disaster said:

Definitely teams know.  That's why I am curious as to why the score hasn't been leaked.

The reporters who know seem like they don't really want to say the number because its bad, but feel comfortable saying its bad, which is a bit ridiculous. Why say it at all.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why even bother playing games anymore?  Just set up a couple of desks at midfield and let the opposing QBs compete for the top test score each week.  Then, the two with the highest averages face off at the end of the season in a Super Bowl Quiz Off. 

Must see TV.

Edited by NanuqoftheNorth
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So PFF did an interview with one of the co-founders, and he says a lot of these leaks are bullshit, but he does concede that all the top QBs in this class scored really well. He says that about 30 minutes in.

 

 

Edited by Dilla
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Dilla said:

So PFF did an interview with one of the co-founders, and he says a lot of these leaks are bullshit, but he does concede that all the top QBs in this class scored really well. He says that about 30 minutes in.

 

 

This was a good.

Listened to it on their podcast the other day.  It gives a really good breakdown and explanation.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's all remember that the time we're in is PEAK BS season.

We see teams "leak" all kinds of information to try to manipulate the draft.  I'm sure teams in the bottom of the top 10 are happy to say some BS to try and get folks to pass on a top QB so they can "fall" to them.

Let's also give a shout out to the "wait til next year!" folks.  They are more than happy to point out that next year's group is so much better than this year's crop of young men.  That's just human nature =P

I still have no idea who the Panthers pick.  Nor do I care.  They are going to pick a QB, and I'm going to be behind them 100% until they prove they suck.  I'm going to trust this staff to develop them and put them in a situation to be successful.  I mean, if they don't, then they'll be out of a job pretty quickly.

Stroud is an elite thrower of the football.  He showed some great stuff in the Georgia game, but we didn't see those improvisation skills much of the rest of the season.  Young is an elite processor who is a point guard of a QB, but to say he lacks ideal size is an understatement.  Richardson is a Madden Cheat code of a player, but will he be able to reach his ceiling in time for a coach to not get fired?  Levis eats bananas with their skins on...need we say more?

Enjoy the BS/smokescreens!  Two more weeks (right, it's the 29th?) until we find out for sure!

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Why even bother playing games anymore?  Just set up a couple of desks at midfield and let the opposing QBs compete for the top test score each week.  Then, the two with the highest averages face off at the end of the season in a Super Bowl Quiz Off. 

Must see TV.

It's just part of the evaluation process. 

If he drops because of an S2 score he might land in a better situation and consequently have a better career as a result. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/14/2023 at 6:59 PM, Dilla said:

So PFF did an interview with one of the co-founders, and he says a lot of these leaks are bullshit, but he does concede that all the top QBs in this class scored really well. He says that about 30 minutes in.

 

 

Came here to post this. Pretty much shoots down the rumors about CJ scoring low. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trying to help those 3 folks who hate this move.    In 2025 2.75 million is basically the new "vet" minimum.    They still need #3 RB and returner, draft could/should be the lane for that.    There's no downside to this move, they could cut with little effect and replace with your chosen rookie.   
    • Is it though? Even looking at just this past year, DK played 3 more games and had 81 more yards than Higgins had, but he also did it on less catches, with DK averaging 15 yards per catch and Higgins with 12.5. Yes, Higgins had 10 TDs to DK's 5, but I'd say that was far less about the WRs than the QBs, seeing as Burrow had 43 TDs (and only 9 INTs) to Geno's 21 TDs (and 15 INTs).  Swap the two of them last year and DK puts up better stats with Burrow as his QB than Higgins did, no doubt about it in my mind. DK has also only missed 3 games in his career, Higgins has missed 5 in each of the last 2 seasons. People here complain about our WR speed (and it's many people's biggest issue with T-Mac in the draft), but Higgins ran a 4.59 40 and DK ran a 4.33. DK has only played one more season than Higgins but he has 1,730 yards and 14 TDs more than Higgins, despite playing with the ghost of Russell Wilson and Geno Smith, while Higgins has had Burrow. To me, there is no debate, DK is a significantly better WR than Higgins.  Give him Burrow as his QB during his career and his numbers would dwarf what Higgins has put up.
    • Thanks to @CarolinaLivin for the Juan-like work!  
×
×
  • Create New...