Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pauline believes it's Stroud, but Reich wants AR


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

That's a good point.  You don't see nearly as many in college (or maybe I just don't notice).  My first thought was bigger stronger hits in the NFL, but college also has smaller players taking hits so you think it would produce similar results...  Dan Morgan and Luke never had the in college and in the NFL it was an issue.

Yes, I'm researching to see what is the college policy on Concussion with little luck so far.

I know that they have made 'targeting" a big deal. But I'm not sure if they have any type of policy to catch concussions like the NFL does.

I imagine, it will be a lot more challenging due to resources at some colleges...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Martin said:

The reported playing weight of Young is ~185 and reported playing weight of Stroud is +220. 

Every player in the NFL is an injury risk due to the nature of the have. Stroud at +220 is more within the standard of current players while Young is an outlier. 

There are no guarantees that one will stay healthier than the other, but purely theoretical it would seem that Young would be at a higher risk, and hence the concerns have been raised by most pundits and our own head coach.

I rather use combine weight than reported weight. Bryce was reportedly 6 feet before the combine...

as far as the combine goes, CJ was 214 pounds then, & lost 1 pound for his pro day. 

220 sounds good, so I'm not sure why a QB would voluntarily lose weight for the combine when his original weight was "ideal"...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

I get what you're saying but height and weight are two different things and really don't have an effect on each other. There are a lot of 6' overweight people that weigh over well over 200 lbs while there are also a lot of 6' plus guys that weigh less than 200 lbs. Now, in such cases, which is "bigger" depends on if you're referencing height or weight.

Either way the point is moot and we've all (myself included) gotten way too into the weeds re: measurables than we needed to lmao.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, travisura said:

I was using what Google told me, which is that Stroud weighed a couple of pounds more. Then I was corrected and told that according to combine measurements, Stroud weighed a couple of pounds less. The spirit of the argument that I was trying to make was that there is not a significant difference in their weight, but yes, I did say that Stroud weighed more before the clarification was made. The spirit of the argument that I was pushing back on was saying that Stroud was "smaller" than Tua because he weighed 3 pounds less at their respective combine weigh ins. 3 pounds is not enough in my mind to claim someone is "smaller", especially when the person who weighs 3 pounds less is 2 inches taller.

I understand your point. 

but to be clear, CJ at 6'3 weighing less than Tua 6'1 makes CJ even less dense that Tua, therefore more susceptible to be "raggedolled" like some were saying Tua did.

But generally, I do agree with you that 3 pounds between the 2 is not that big a deal. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

LOL....if you are that confident, im sure you have already put money on the pick. You would make a lot money then. Lol 

Yeah I have $500 on Bryce

I did put 100 on AR though too because Tepper will forever be a wildcard

Edited by *FreeFua*
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • For the silly people that worship her it will be that.  The Coleman 'legend' thing, they did that with another fairly average player that was here and I sort of mocked or questioned the 'legend' status. Instantly caught crap for insulting someone's favorite Panther. So okay, Kurt Coleman is a Legend. 
    • You allow him to compete--you all are talking as if I am proposing making him the starter. Give him a new coach, new weapons, good OL, etc. and see what happens. You are saying, "Well Damn.  It did not work for 3 guys..."  Right now, our C is injured, we lost our top 2 WRs.  Better question:  If you need a QB, Why would you not take a chance on bringing in a QB who was a former first rounder, a good arm, intelligence, mobility, youth, etc.  and see how he does out of NY--with a better OL, better running game, better receivers.  I am not saying give him a 10-year contract, I am saying give him a chance. You act like there is no improvement on offense here--it was a 2 year process, and next year is year 2.  To me, how can you sit there with Bryce and an opportunity to sign a veteran QB on the cheap comes available and you say--"Not us. We're good.  We are waiting for Patrick Mahommes."  Jone's problem is obviously mental--and he has little support.  Why is this so frigging hard to comprehend.  It is called "bottom fishing" and it is better than sitting in the boat.  
    • I think we're going to fall from behind quite early and be forced to abandon the run game.  3 rushes -2 yards 1 catch -10 yards 
×
×
  • Create New...