Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Examining The First 3 Rounds


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

I know a lot of people see edge as a huge need but i just dont understand it.  Especially considering we will be in 34 probably 20% of the time.  Burns, luvu, haynes, and barno seem fine for now.  A need sure, one of the biggest?   I just dont see it.  Is it because everyone is excited about the switch to 34 and edge is kind of a flashy new toy?  I would say de is more of a need right now as far as the transition.   Evero's scheme is built around having a very talented secondary.  The rest of the posistions are more plug and play with solid players who know their role.  I appreciate all the work you did on your post.

Edited by Tr3ach
  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

I know a lot of people see edge as a huge need but i just dont understand it.  Especially considering we will be in 34 probably 20% of the time.  Burns, luvu, haynes, and barno seem fine for now.  A need sure, one of the biggest?   I just dont see it.  Is it because everyone is excited about the switch to 34 and edge is kind of a flashy new toy?  I would say de is more of a need right now as far as the transition. 

I do not see Luvu as an edge--I think they play him at ILB.  That may explain it, and Barno is very raw and unproven.   That is probably the reason we are not on the same page--I really do not know how they will use Luvu and Chinn--so this is hard to gauge--but last year, we have Luvu and Barno and YGM and Burns--aside from Burns, Luvu had 7 sacks, but he was not playing edge/end.  So who knows?  However, if you decide Luvu is an edge rusher, you need a LB--

But yeah, it is hard to gauge--you have to pick 1 perspective and stick to it to avoid madness.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MHS831 said:

I do not see Luvu as an edge--I think they play him at ILB.  That may explain it, and Barno is very raw and unproven.   That is probably the reason we are not on the same page--I really do not know how they will use Luvu and Chinn--so this is hard to gauge--but last year, we have Luvu and Barno and YGM and Burns--aside from Burns, Luvu had 7 sacks, but he was not playing edge/end.  So who knows?  However, if you decide Luvu is an edge rusher, you need a LB--

But yeah, it is hard to gauge--you have to pick 1 perspective and stick to it to avoid madness.

Understandable.   I honestly see Luvu as better at an edge but who knows.  He will definitely kick inside out of the base defense.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tr3ach said:

Understandable.   I honestly see Luvu as better at an edge but who knows.  He will definitely kick inside out of the base defense.

You know, if they decide BPA during the draft, they could take the Edge and play Luvu at ILB--but they are going to move people around, change things up- so I think they will like the hybrid players. 

If I were picking in this draft in round 2, I would want an edge because they, imo, are the deepest group--as deep as TE.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I do not see Luvu as an edge--I think they play him at ILB.  That may explain it, and Barno is very raw and unproven.   That is probably the reason we are not on the same page--I really do not know how they will use Luvu and Chinn--so this is hard to gauge--but last year, we have Luvu and Barno and YGM and Burns--aside from Burns, Luvu had 7 sacks, but he was not playing edge/end.  So who knows?  However, if you decide Luvu is an edge rusher, you need a LB--

But yeah, it is hard to gauge--you have to pick 1 perspective and stick to it to avoid madness.

Luvu has played OLB and ILB in 34, but has more snaps at OLB.  I think his skill set is better suited for OLB personally.  I see ILB as a big need in the draft and hope they pick Jack Cambell.  

Burns, Shaq, Campbell, Luvu would be a pretty good group

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Luvu has played OLB and ILB in 34, but has more snaps at OLB.  I think his skill set is better suited for OLB personally.  I see ILB as a big need in the draft and hope they pick Jack Cambell.  

Burns, Shaq, Campbell, Luvu would be a pretty good group

Campbell is my hope as well if they go that route.  I am also hoping Smith steps up--I think this staff will do him right.

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will McDonald IV from Iowa St should be on this list as well.  That makes at least 13 Edge rushers should go in the top 63 picks.  That is hard to imagine.  That would mean an edge rusher would be picked every 4.8 selections.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may want to look at the rest of the projected 3rd round edge rushers. I think Fitt will trade 39 and may drop out of the 2nd round entirely if a team offers two 3rds or a high 3rd, 4th, and whatever else he can get.

Of the 2nd round edge rushers you have listed, Tuli Tuipulotu would be someone to keep an eye on.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After that Wallace pick my smart friend turned to me and said " Dan is drafting like he's still playing ".... I thought some and was enough hot about the brooks trade up, that I agreed. ____________________________________________________ The best thing about the WR group- They are very young and have potential. The worst thing about the WR group- They are very young and have potential. When I listed the WR group as positive, I honestly do not know if the group is "fixed" or not. Im not from the future or nothing, but either are other folks. I do feel this- This is the deepest group I can ever recall in Panthers history. I'd say its 10 deep and past years they have struggled to bring 5 decent guys into TC even including the UDFA "superstars ". That's doubled my brother!    The huddle is _______ and such, but its treatment of XLs rookie year is among the top 5 WTHs for me. Im old enough to member fantasy football, where it was against the unwritten rules to draft a WR before their 3rd year(rough terms). The trade up to make him a first...... come on it was for a late 6th and well worth the 5th year option.  He had foot and hand issues starting in OTAs last year and still played for 500 yards, 4 TDs, and 50 recs. That was with bad BY, Dalton, and 9 games of bama BY..... in a new offense that was still finding itself. He's under contract for the next 4 years at a bargain if you look at current WR salaries. Coker had a similar year and he's under contract for two more years at min. pay. TMAC, was just the best player on the board. It had nothing to do XL. The deal about WRs is you can play 5 on the same play and its very common for many teams to run 3 WRs sets as their base.   TMAC, XL, and Coker will be moved alllllll around and play different positions, no one is locked into true X spot. You should see this on game days and even Dave has said this too. The one group this team should know best is WR. Dave and his OC brad were WR coaches before each became OCs. In Dave's case, he logged around 8-10 years there. Then one of the better assistant coaches is none other than Rob Moore. Before he started coaching WRs..back in 2009 he was coming off a borderline HOF career. He's got 35 years experience. Add in Dave and Brad and its nearly 50 years. This is not like OL having proved itself, I am projecting here. *provided bama BY is able to get better, I believe this WR group will have a similar result and hold the good rank for 2-3 years. 
    • Yeah, he is leaps and bounds better than Wallace. But the question then becomes, when do you get Wallace the reps to even attempt to develop? I feel the same way about Pratt as I did Ramsey, it's a short solution for a long term situation.   
×
×
  • Create New...