Anthony Richardson Pro Day

[Jaxel]

8 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Times have changed my man. #1 picks play day 1.

 

Can you imagine us throwing out Andy Dalton week 1.lmao

 

 

That's exactly why Richardson won't be the pick.

[CamWhoaaCam]

2 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

That's exactly why Richardson won't be the pick.

Oh I agree. Im just saying if he is he will be the week 1 starter with this roster.

 

Yall gotta stop acting like we are a rebuilding team. 

[csx]

20 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Times have changed my man. #1 picks play day 1.

 

Can you imagine us throwing out Andy Dalton week 1.lmao

 

 

I couldn't care less if the pick plays week 1 or not as long as they play well for years to come. 

[OldhamA]

31 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Times have changed my man. #1 picks play day 1.

 

Can you imagine us throwing out Andy Dalton week 1.lmao

 

 

I think that's exactly why they signed Dalton - he's a proven bridge QB at this point in his career.

[CamWhoaaCam]

6 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

I think that's exactly why they signed Dalton - he's a proven bridge QB at this point in his career.

Proven at what?

 

He hasn't been good since he left Cincy. He's a journeyman and if we are seriously considering starting him we are in a world of trouble.

[Mr. Scot]

 

[DaveThePanther2008]

On 3/30/2023 at 2:41 AM, bythenbrs said:

Why, yes, they are.  Could they get him ready to start by year 2?  Maybe.  Year 3 more likely but, what do I know.  Young and Stroud look much more ready to start this season.

I think if you look at the FA moves, I think we are be set up to ‘win now’ or ‘win sooner, not later’; not in 3 years.  

You have great talent in every position on the offensive side.  Fitterer and Co. have put talent at every position where a young QB can come in a start right away.  Sure you have to bring him along with baby steps but getting him on the field is not necessarily out of the question for any rookie QB including Richardson.  

Putting Richardson on the field now compared to letting him sit for 2 or 3 seasons doesn't make sense.  He is still going to have growing pains in his first year starting.  If we draft him,  Work is ass off and get him ready to start this year.

[jayboogieman]

53 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

If he's good enough for #3, he's good enough for #1. Do it Fitt!

[Krovvy]

2 hours ago, Jaxel said:

I mean, don't take it from me. Here is JT O'Sullivans QB School talking about it and his inconsistencies that result in inaccuracy. I get it, twitter shows a bunch a good throws, but there are a bunch of bad ones that comes with. That's why he's sitting around 55%

Again, I like Richardson, would be happy if he's the pick. At the same time, he's not someone you pick if you want to win today.

 

Yeah, he watched one game and made a YouTube video. I get it.

I watched all the games of all the quarterbacks and form my own opinions.

Edited March 31, 2023 by Krovvy

[Krovvy]

2 hours ago, Steelo Senpai said:

He has a higher rate of first read throws.. because they are open, Yes.  Does he ONLY look for his first read.. no. This myth has been debunked already lol.  His protection was less than elite this season as well..  It's totally alright to prop up or even defend other prospects without dragging down another lol

I never said he only looked to his first read. I said he did it more than any other quarterback in the top four not named Levis. Stroud knows he has all year to make the throw and that given enough time his receiver is going to come open.

[Mother Grabber]

Every time i watched Young play over the last couple of years i always thought, “Holy fug balls! How did he do that?” or “WTF just happened! Damn i wish we could get him.” yes his size is a bit of a concern, but his play making ability is generational.

When i watched Stroud play he was smooth an efficient. he always got the job done. hard to get mad at that, unless you’re rooting for the other team.

When i watched Richardson play i laughed my ass off and thought, “OMG this guy sucks the balls off a line of donkeys waiting at Krispy Kreme.” i couldn’t watch a full game of his he was so bad. 

so there’s that.

[Jaxel]

10 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

Yeah, he watched one game and made a YouTube video. I get it.

I watched all the games of all the quarterbacks and form my own opinions.

That's great and I'm glad you do, but I'm going to take the word from the former pro QB who understands and breaks down several aspects of pro and prospect QBs across many games over a message board scout.

[Krovvy]

Just now, Jaxel said:

That's great and I'm glad you do, but I'm going to take the word from the former pro QB who understands and breaks down several aspects of pro and prospect QBs across many games over a message board scout.

Yeah, I understand. Deferring to a perceived authority that shares your initial opinion is what most people do.

[Jaxel]

52 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

You have great talent in every position on the offensive side.  Fitterer and Co. have put talent at every position where a young QB can come in a start right away.  Sure you have to bring him along with baby steps but getting him on the field is not necessarily out of the question for any rookie QB including Richardson.  

Putting Richardson on the field now compared to letting him sit for 2 or 3 seasons doesn't make sense.  He is still going to have growing pains in his first year starting.  If we draft him,  Work is ass off and get him ready to start this year.

I agree, I think it would be similar to a Justin Fields situation where he would start maybe by mid-year. I don't think he's as refined as Justin Fields was coming out, but he could thrive like Fields has with his athleticism. I will stress, it took Fields till the end of year 2 to just start to put things together... and that's just from a running stand point. His passing still has some way to go.