Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let's talk Terrace Marshall


TheMaulClaw
 Share

Recommended Posts

     Sort of surprised there hasn't been a thread on him yet considering the obvious.  What should we realistically expect out of Marshall this year?  Last season he had 28 receptions for 490 yards with 47 targets.  That's an average of 17.5 ypc which is pretty strong compared to other wrs around the league.  His production was limited in the first 4 games under Rhule, and slowed down during the last 2 games of the year.  The Tampa game at the end of the year was by far his worst recording two fumbles in that game, his only two fumbles of the year. 

     Marshall seems to excel as a downfield receiver in terms of ypc, but his lack of targets and catches point to separation/route running issues.  Obviously there were QB issues as well and that didn't help his cause. 

    This is a make or break year for Marshall.  Considering his injury issues at LSU, his rookie season should be chalked up as a wash as it was about health and physical conditioning.  This past season we saw some flashes with some big plays, yet he was remarkably inconsistent and seemed to disappear for long stretches. 

    Considering the talent level of the new coaches, at minimum it would seem to be a failure of a season for Marshall if he doesn't at least have 50 catches this season.  More catches likely mean a lower ypc average.  I'd project around 13 to 15 ypc.  On the high end this is 750 yards receiving and on the low 650 yards.  This seems to be an appropriate minimum standard for his production that would justify securing him for the future. 

   The kid has some big play talent, but fundamentally breaking the press and short yardage routes seem to be the primary area that he needs to focus on improving.

   Marshall also needs to pick up his play in the redzone.  He is not a small receiver and has plenty of physical ability.  One touchdown all season that came in a blowout loss in garbage time is highly unacceptable and also may point to a need to get stronger for contested catches.

  I think that an offensive scheme change will greatly benefit Marshall as well working with Thielen in terms of route running technique.  I will leave it to discussion about whether or not we see him developing into a legitimate offensive weapon or going the way of Dwayne Jarrett.

 

Edited by TheMaulClaw
  • Pie 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now I would assume he's penciled in as a starter outside. Chark and Marshall outside, Thielen in the slot. My hope is 800+ yards. 1000+ would be awesome.

Chark, Marshall, and Thielen need to combine for about 1500 yards between them. 500 from Hurst. Another 500 or so from the other WRs. Another 250 or so from the other TEs. Toss in 500 combined from the RBs and that gets your rookie QB comfortable over 3000 passing yards.

If the rookie is a baller, I could easily see Chark, Marshall, and Thielen producing a combined 2000 yards IF Chark plays all 17 games.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think hes going to break out

 

he was stuck in the Matt Rhule doghouse of all places, and when he did get run last season he had his share or below average QBs and an OC that was wiping pastry dust off his shirt. 

 

Hes flashed and I really think he needs an opportunity with both volume and competent QB and scheme and I really think he can pop. 

 

i envision him as a very solid WR2 and I feel like that should be the expectation. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Huddler said:

i think hes going to break out

 

he was stuck in the Matt Rhule doghouse of all places, and when he did get run last season he had his share or below average QBs and an OC that was wiping pastry dust off his shirt. 

 

Hes flashed and I really think he needs an opportunity with both volume and competent QB and scheme and I really think he can pop. 

 

i envision him as a very solid WR2 and I feel like that should be the expectation. 

We've definitely seen that Matt Rhule not playing a guy isn't necessarily indicative of him not being able to play (Bozeman). I really hope that Reich is a guy who is just going to play the best damn players. I really didn't feel like Ron or Rhule did that. Ron had his favorites based largely on loyalty. Rhule had his favorites seemingly based on his ego. Just play the best players.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As you guys said. Its time to put up the numbers now. Seemed like he came on a little at the tail end of the season when Darnold was playing pretty good. Seems to operate well mid/deep. Not a lot of YAC. 

 

Another interesting prospect is Preston Williams, I think an injury history but had a pretty good year in Miami I believe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We've definitely seen that Matt Rhule not playing a guy isn't necessarily indicative of him not being able to play (Bozeman). I really hope that Reich is a guy who is just going to play the best damn players. I really didn't feel like Ron or Rhule did that. Ron had his favorites based largely on loyalty. Rhule had his favorites seemingly based on his ego. Just play the best players.

This is a key point that gives me some optimism. 

In my mind, Bozeman being a vet was in a much better position to come in and excel at his job.  TMJ, on the other hand, was a raw NFL player coming back from injury while trying to get his feet under him so I can see where he wasn't able to flourish.  He needs a healthy off-season and some competent coaching.  Hopefully the added pressure is not too much for him and he can take a leap forward.   As its been said previously, he has several areas he needs to work on but has also shown signs that he is very capable. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call me crazy but I’m not worried about him at all.

 

It’s been said, but he was in the doghouse for unknown reasons. 
 

He flashed down the stretch and made some great catches. 
 

We now have actually offensive coaches, and better options at QB (at least I’ll assume this).

 

55-75 catches

800-1000+ yards 

6-10 TD’s

 

Those are windows that I think are realistic, and honestly I’m satisfied if he falls anywhere in there. Just keep improving.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Right now I would assume he's penciled in as a starter outside. Chark and Marshall outside, Thielen in the slot. My hope is 800+ yards. 1000+ would be awesome.

Chark, Marshall, and Thielen need to combine for about 1500 yards between them. 500 from Hurst. Another 500 or so from the other WRs. Another 250 or so from the other TEs. Toss in 500 combined from the RBs and that gets your rookie QB comfortable over 3000 passing yards.

If the rookie is a baller, I could easily see Chark, Marshall, and Thielen producing a combined 2000 yards IF Chark plays all 17 games.

Baller from day 1 or not, in a Frank Reich pass first offense our rookie should be able to get 4000+ passing yards in 17 games. I'd be disappointed if our top 3 WRs combine for less than 2000 (accounting for health, i.e. if Chark misses time, whoever moves up in the lineup's stats would count towards that top 3 season cumulative).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, t96 said:

Baller from day 1 or not, in a Frank Reich pass first offense our rookie should be able to get 4000+ passing yards in 17 games. I'd be disappointed if our top 3 WRs combine for less than 2000 (accounting for health, i.e. if Chark misses time, whoever moves up in the lineup's stats would count towards that top 3 season cumulative).

Just keeping in mind, there's only been four 4000 yard rookie QBs in NFL history. Yeah it's a pass happy league now and yeah there's an extra game but setting 4000 yards as the floor is asking a LOT.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...