Peter King: Panthers have no interest in trading #1 pick

[exactlyzack]

18 minutes ago, KBRed said:

My sources say it will either be Young or Stroud. 

My sources says you’re either wrong or you’re right.

[onmyown]

god this these type of headlines make my head hurt

just goes to show how unrealistic Madden is to be able to delusion people into thinking such dumbassery is actually feasible

[therealmjl]

44 minutes ago, KBRed said:

My sources say it will either be Young or Stroud. 

Sources?

[therealmjl]

25 minutes ago, exactlyzack said:

My sources says you’re either wrong or you’re right.

Sources please?

[OldhamA]

There's basically only one team you can trade with, unless you really like Richardson, so this doesn't come as a surprise.

[Dave Gettleman's Shorts]

36 minutes ago, rightturn said:

long snapper bro

you comin brooo????

[LinvilleGorge]

3 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

There's basically only one team you can trade with, unless you really like Richardson, so this doesn't come as a surprise.

This. It was rumored that we were looking to trade up to #3 but the cost to go all the way up to #1 wasn't much more, so why not? At #3 I have to assume we would've been likely looking at Richardson and/or Levis. But at #1? I'm sold as fug on Richardson's talent, but my god it would take some gigantic brass balls to take him at #1 over Young and Stroud.

[KSpan]

[jayboogieman]

52 minutes ago, KBRed said:

My sources say it will either be Levis, Richardson, or Robinson.

[panfanman]

My source says none of you have a clue and your source don't either.  It's all conjecture. Lol

[Soul Rebel]

[stratocatter]

Anyone ever conclude how much more it may have taken to get to #1 over #3?

[frankw]

[LinvilleGorge]

8 minutes ago, panfanman said:

My source says none of you have a clue and your source don't either.  It's all conjecture. Lol