Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Moneyball is here


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

none of these deals will become crippling, thats a key point. Most are of the two year easy 3rd year out type too. 

 

None are Charles Johnson 5 year 72 million either.

 

Shaq took a pay cut.

 

Boz was the best signing in the whole NFL. 

Edited by Basbear
  • Pie 7
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Varking said:

It’s not next level analytics lol. There aren’t game breaker offensive players on the market worth spending the money on. 

That’s what analytics is about finding value where others see a JAG. Time will tell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's also something to be said for *not* having a true #1 WR imho. You've still got to have some talented guys, but I think an offense is more dangerous when the distribution is very diverse. Things are less predictable and it makes it more challenging for defenses to key in on favored targets when the ball could go anywhere on any play without that traditional focal point. Of course you've got to have a QB with a quick processor and an accurate arm. Hmm...

  • Pie 7
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, UnluckyforSome said:

Isn't he awful in everything?

This is actually when he was good, his peak was Wolfe of Wall Street. Been down Hill (pun intended) since he lost weight and adopted his weird fashion style

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RJK said:

Other than Superbad and wolf of Wall Street, yes. 

What about that gun runner movie, he was ok in it. 

Ive never seen wall street, i heard he took that film for like 25k in order to just be a part of it (leo&martin)

jump street 21/22 he wasnt too bad. 

Edited by Basbear
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I largely detached from the NBA altogether the last few months. I had no idea the Pistons somehow stumbled into the playoffs. Seems like even the poverty franchises are a few tiers above us. Unreal.
    • I think it's a possibility of them moving to #3 with the Giants for Carter because.. The Giants can't take Sanders at 3, it's too high (and too much pressure). Get a 3rd and 4th round and maybe a next year 2nd (not too steep) and they save face and get their man and we get ours. If the price is too much, Morgan won't do it.  It's the same for us. We wouldn't mind moving back a couple of spaces but teams won't give up too much. If our top 3 picks are gone at 8, people might not give us a ton to move, but we may get something and still get a good player at 12-15 or so.  I don't think teams will over pay to move up this year, so the next best thing is get what you can and still get a decent pick.
    • We can't right this ship in a single offseason anyway. Dan Morgan needs to focus on the basics. If he gets hung up on trying to get value out of this pick or that pick and trying to acquire extra assets like Scott Fitterer used to always thinking he was the smartest guy in the building then Dan is in all likelihood in for another rude awakening. And as usual the fanbase will be the ones picking up the pieces.
×
×
  • Create New...