Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers sign Chark


Panthers316
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

Also I think Chicago is getting more pissed by the minute.  They thought they were getting a really high pick for next year.  
 

Not so fast.  While I don’t expect to be winning the SB next year. Winning the NFC South could be in the cards.  Every signing just drops the value of of that trade even more.  
 

And I don’t think we are done.  I don’t expect another big name but we still have plenty on money left.  I expect post draft holes to continue to be filled.  

Rookie qb teams still tend to be picking top 10 going into year 2

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

It's 100% going to be a defensive guy... probably a safety, linebacker or EDGE. I just cant see a path where we go offense unless there is an absolute stud sitting there. 

I hope not a safety as they are sitting on the bench behind Woods and Bell. Edge or LB I am all for. Still think WR is in play with Chark only being one year deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheSpecialJuan said:


 

 

1 hour ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Jesus I just realized we will have a COMPLETELY different Offensive skill player starting lineup than last year. Like, no returning starters whatsoever it was completely overhauled.

Moore to Thielen

Anderson to Chark

Thomas to Hurst

CMC to Sanders

Baker to Rookie QB/Dalton for a few weeks

There are no prior pictures of the panthers 2023 starters in a panther uniform.  

 Yeah, it's crazy. I was thinking about this earlier as well. It's a ground up rebuild at the skill position and it's fuging insane to think how much different it's going to look. But you can tell there's real football evaluators making decisions this time. They said "Ok, O-line is a strength keep it intact, let's use these other assets to reform and mould exactly what we want."

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I can. Thielen is a 33 year old short term stopgap. Chark is an oft-injured talented guy on a one year prove it deal. Hurst is knocking on the door of 30 and can easily be cut after two seasons.

These FA signings are about short-term bandaids. The draft is about long-term solutions.

I would imagine that the offensive skill positions are very much on the table at #39.

Why am I getting this message when I try to message you?

 

You are only allowed to send 0 messages per day. Please try again later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I can. Thielen is a 33 year old short term stopgap. Chark is an oft-injured talented guy on a one year prove it deal. Hurst is knocking on the door of 30 and can easily be cut after two seasons.

These FA signings are about short-term bandaids. The draft is about long-term solutions.

I would imagine that the offensive skill positions are very much on the table at #39.

Yeah plus we still don't have any potential alpha #1 WR for this season. We could get that at #39. Thielen is a slot guy, Chark is a downfield threat as a solid 2nd WR but we still don't have that do-it-all #1. If the draft doesn't fall that way we can absolutely go BPA but if there's a WR sitting there with that #1 potential we absolutely will seriously consider him. Even if we take a guy and he doesn't turn out to be a #1, like you said both guys we signed are more stopgaps or prove-its, if we draft a guy who doesn't work out as #1 he could still be our longer term #2 or #3 option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a big fan of the signing myself, mainly because he can't stay healthy and it still doesn't give us a #1 WR for the rookie, would have preferred to overpay in a trade for Hopkins, Sutton, or Jeudy to be honest.

Also not thrilled at it being just 1 year unless it's super cheap at say like $3 million for the year, have a feeling it's going to be in the 6-7 range.  Would have rather done it for 2 with whatever we gave him being the guaranteed money so the cap hit could be split up.

But really, I just don't like the idea of giving the rookie a bunch of 2's and 3's at best as his WR room and I think this signing eliminates us from trying to trade for any of those #1's out there.

100% still need to use the 2nd rounder on a WR though, someone who could have breakout potential and to grow alongside the rookie QB for years to come.

  • Poo 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

PSA

 

I will be pooing every single baby chark doo doo doo post i see.  bunch of MFers thinking they are so origional and clever. i encourage yall to do the same

 

with all that said, im fugin stoked

 

THATS THE PICK ME UP I NEEDED BITCH

 

side note: I have Chark in all of my dynasty fantasy leagues.  always believed in him.  either injury or being stuck in the jags with shitty QB play and coaching have held him back. he has the opportunity of a lifetime here being our #1 with a damn good OL, supporting cast, coaching, scheme, and QB. 

 

hes about to go the fug off on that prove it deal

I'll take that challenge...

"It's CAT-SHARK"!!!!

 93d2b5fe3b8ea827282958eef37270b8.thumb.jpg.dcf0a64324719129a2b76e13749efd14.jpg

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NFL Pro has the All-22 up already 😄 Going to grab a play or two from each redzone series to put screenshots to. Looks like AT angled his route off to the near pylon rather than the back corner where Bryce was throwing to. I imagine this is something they'll quickly try to figure out with Thielen back from IR. After watching the All-22 again, this was actually a pretty nifty play. I thought it was a TE screen to Tremble because of the way XL charged the DB, but he quickly shed and kept upfield as seen in the second screenshot. This looks like it had multiple layers built into it with AT running the crosser, XL the fade, Tremble to the flat. The progression would call for the play to go to Chuba here as the LB does follow Tremble out into the flat. Ball hits Chuba low and in the hands, but the LB does a good job disrupting the catch.
    • The bottom lines to me are that a) we played well enough to beat the best team in the league and b) Bryce Young is growing into a bridge QB role (his ceiling) for us. As much as I don't want BY around after the season, it seems DC can still build the O with a game manager at QB for now. Best case scanario, we can build the D through the draft this year and take a QB we have conviction outside the 1st this or next draft. If BY keeps improving, we are going to win a couple more games this year.
    • Bryce has been a completely different QB since coming back. That started in Denver where it was obviously he was playing a lot more loose and willing to push the ball downfield  Bryce continues to build off of the previous weeks performance and that’s what you want to see Bryce has been making some real good anticipation throws. Reading defenses well. Pushing the ball downfield (7 throws of 20+ air yards yesterday. 8 if you want to include PI to Thielen). The deep ball accuracy has been there. Some of Young’s best throws yesterday were incompletions. Sideline balls to XL and Moore both should’ve been caught. RZ dot to Tremble should’ve been caught. And another RZ ball to Moore that Young gave him a chance at. Bryce is starting to execute Canales offense and yesterday Canales finally opened it up a bit. Canales was to blame for the 126 passing yards in Germany as he played a more conservative game.  The next bit I’m looking for his for Young to be a bit more decisive with running the ball. Start putting that on film and it’ll help open things up a tad
×
×
  • Create New...