Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young Pro Day


ForJimmy
 Share

Recommended Posts

As much as  i want it to be Stroud, I see what Young has to be incredibly special.   I think that Young will be the most successful QB IF he can stay healthy. 

So, to me, the choice is:  Do you want to pick the best QB for what he can bring to your team, or do you want to pick the other guy because the best QB might get hurt?  Winners do not make choices fearing negative consequences.  As a whole, Young has been slightly better vs. better competition.

I think they are protecting QBs today more than they did 5 years ago.  Young seems to have a sixth sense, and that, combined with his ability to see the field like nobody I have seen since maybe Brees, will be the difference.  Would I take Young?  Yes, but I would be sad about passing on Stroud.  If we take Stroud, missing out on Young will bother me.

  • Pie 8
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

You want Young playing WR or Smith playing QB? I’d advise against either.

I was talking about the post pro-day interview. Bryce seemed to be … comparable in size to Smith. Just an observation and wanted to know if anyone else had an opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tbe said:

If I’m honest, he would be my favorite if he were bigger.

I think the size concerns are overblown. Stroud is the better pure passer with a stronger arm, but Young does everything else the position requires(calling out protections, reads, scrambling, etc) today better. I prefer Young because he plays the game a little better and never seemed to get rattled by pressure.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

I think the size concerns are overblown. Stroud is the better pure passer with a stronger arm, but Young does everything else the position requires(calling out protections, reads, scrambling, etc) today better. I prefer Young because he plays the game a little better and never seemed to get rattled by pressure.

On the other hand, the myth that Stroud doesn't call out protections and pre-snap reads is way over blown.  Bryce displayed better scrambling ability, but both can scramble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...