Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Simms top QB prospects


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Simms is just a hot take artist. He had Zach Wilson over Lawrence. Mac Jones and Kellen Mond of all people over Justin Fields

 

Exactly-when I opened this thread, I was expecting some radical take.  As players, I do not see Young and Stroud on different levels.  I see the same level, different tools

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OldhamA said:

He's also like 4 years older.

The ACL is a lot more worrisome than his age.  He's not 36-years old.  It's rare to hit on a QB in the draft and even rarer they stay with their draft franchise their entire career. To that end, being a few years older isn't that big of a deal.  It also means he's more experienced. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, rebelrouser said:

No way in hell he thinks Young drops to second round so those figures on the left are their qb rank. LOL at Levis. 

Of course the one on the left is the rank. 

I was asking for the definition of the tiers. 

and especially the 4th tier with Dorian, DTR, if it says something about what round. (Doesn't seem so) Not heard DTR being suggested in rounds 1, 2,3 before so either he is high on him or really low on Levis. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Panthering said:

Always enjoy Simms QB analysis, he's not perfect & no one is. But he dives in pretty deep and always has some insightful comments, looking forward to his breakdown of this.

Agreed - you have to put yourself out there when you do this sort of thing. He has nailed a few that GMs and coaches got wrong, but he has also missed significantly on a few. It happens to everyone. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...