Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why not both?


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, tukafan21 said:

I like Thielen as he'd be a good slot safety valve for a rookie and would be a great vet presence in the WR room to teach these guys how to be pros, particularly TMJ and whichever WR we draft in the 2nd.

But I just don't see the need for Chark, he's similar to TMJ and very injury prone, just not someone I'd like to see us target as I don't think he brings enough value to us right now.

Thielen slot possession guy, TMJ outside clasher and Chark deep threat they would all have their roles 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

If we trying to sign both why not just go after a true #1 like Hopkins?

 

Then we really in business.

I’m sure I’m in the minority but Hopkins scares me more than Chark due to age and injury history alone. I’m not sure he would want to come here at this stage of his career and a rookie QB but that’s just my speculation.

Edited by Prowler2k18
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a BIG fan of Thielen.  I think tales of his lost step are overstated. 

Yes, he's not his 26 year old self, but the guy still maintained his WR2 status in a year where Osbourn was supposed to start taking a big increased load and JJ's targets continue to go up as a league wide superstar. I would love to see him somehow be that leader vet receiver that supports and mentors up an entire group under him.  He could set up a great legacy move for him if he is the leader for a young offense like the one we're putting together.  Get him for his late career for a few years, he can sign/retire a Vike down the road.  

Sure hands for a guy that can get open quick is a perfect vet.  

Chark is a good upside gamble because when he does play, he's a solid X receiver.  TMJ can be flanker.  I'm unsure if Chark signs here though, but would be optimistic about it if it happens.  

Them combined would open things up not just positionally, but in receiver type.  Could take anyone from Mingo to Scott to Downs with that type of group.  

 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...