Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sanders? Just help me understand.

SmittysLawnGuy

By SmittysLawnGuy,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

SmittysLawnGuy Veteran

SmittysLawnGuy

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I'm not your typical negative Nancy n wonder if Duce n Frank pitched this. I actually thinks Fitts maybe our best ever Hope I'm wrong about Sanders. Just thought we could get better reps for 3 million less. I hope I'm as wrong as this sub does, but you know them, Marvin Mcnutt is gold you hater!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmittysLawnGuy Veteran

SmittysLawnGuy

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I think we have to wait until we see him behind our OL and our scheme. I personally don’t think RB is that big of a need when you can draft one in any round this year and come out with a good one but as far as Sanders’ contract goes I don’t mind it.

I’d probably have gone cheap and just signed someone like Jeff Wilson but I’m not going to hate on the Sanders deal because I think his contract is very fair.

Below is the AAV’s for NFL running back’s, if Sanders is overpaid, it’s by a measly $350K a year.

https://overthecap.com/position/running-back

As for Foreman, I think he showed that he is one dimensional last year. Baltimore, Pittsburgh, and Tampa all shut him down last year down the stretch and unfortunately we ended up losing those games. When he isn’t breaking tackles, he doesn’t provide a whole lot.

 

You just begged my point. No shade at Sanders but why? Think you agree with me without joining this shitshows venom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

You just begged my point. No shade at Sanders but why? Think you agree with me without joining this shitshows venom.

We have money to spend, might as well spend it. It would be one thing if we could get elite talent at the WR position but unfortunately the free agent WR group is trash.

Running back and tight end are the next best options to address for a young QB and the Panthers addressed both.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmittysLawnGuy Veteran

SmittysLawnGuy

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

We have money to spend, might as well spend it. It would be one thing if we could get elite talent at the WR position but unfortunately the free agent WR group is trash.

Running back and tight end are the next best options to address for a young QB and the Panthers addressed both.

It's a lovely thought but if land Chark tomorrow I'm set! If we're 2 mill off it's gonna make me cry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmittysLawnGuy Veteran

SmittysLawnGuy

Posted
  • Author
Posted
13 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

We have money to spend, might as well spend it. It would be one thing if we could get elite talent at the WR position but unfortunately the free agent WR group is trash.

Running back and tight end are the next best options to address for a young QB and the Panthers addressed both.

Hope I didn't spew at you, was tired of getting accosted. Your points were great. Fear the huddle reading them. The staff has been perfect up to and including 2 firsts for Sean Gilbert. Never disagree with them! Blame everyone and your friends later!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Eric4280 Mentor

Eric4280

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Sanders is probably 6x better than Hubbard. Hubbard had a few nice runs last year but he’s still butt cheeks. The new system probably needs a RB with hands, that ain’t Chuba 

This. To ME, Hubbard is cut worthy and we could draft someone in the 6th round that’s better. He has terrible hands in terms of ball security AND receiving. It’s not like he’s got game breaking speed. He was opportune, as many other backs in this system were. Much rather have Sanders/ Kendre Miller.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

It's a lovely thought but if land Chark tomorrow I'm set! If we're 2 mill off it's gonna make me cry.

If we’re off by $2M for a WR that has barely cracked the 1K mark and has never played a full season then he wanted too much money anyway in my opinion.

He’s really the only young WR left so we’ll probably have to overpay a bit but it is what it is I guess, shout-out John Fox.

But yeah, in reality, that deal needs to get done. There’s nothing else out there at the WR position.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmittysLawnGuy Veteran

SmittysLawnGuy

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Know what I hate more than anything, n show yourself out. It's not your money why do you care? I literally would love to hang those people by the balls n let them pop bleed out. Cap is fugging real n your real fugging dumb you exploded ball bastards!

Edited by SmittysLawnGuy
  • Poo 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...