Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DJ Chark visiting Panthers


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

We don't really have enough ammunition for another trade. 

Unless we're dangling Chinn, and to fully monetize his trade value, it needs to be with a team looking for Cam Chancellor 2.0 AND has a receiver we like that they are willing to part with.  That's a very dependent path...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Is it worth it to try and get Jeudy with our second pick? 

They want a first round pick, or a high second round pick plus a player.

He's not as good as the WR we've just traded away. 

Edited by OldhamA
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

They want a first round pick, or a high second round pick plus a player.

He's not as good as the WR we've just traded away. 

What about Hopkins, surely it wouldn’t take that much capital, just have to restructure his contract on the agreed upon trade right? 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

They want a first round pick, or a high second round pick plus a player.

He's not as good as the WR we've just traded away. 

I would laugh in their face. If anything, Jeudy underperformed. He has never lived up to the hype. Plus, he has a little bit of an injury history. A second or a player at most.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

I haven't read what they want for Hopkins, but isn't he in his 30s?

I saw rumors the starting price for Hopkins is a 2nd. On top of the contract I don’t think Carolina can make it work 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I would laugh in their face. If anything, Jeudy underperformed. He has never lived up to the hype. Plus, he has a little bit of an injury history. A second or a player at most.

He's a South Florida turncoat, so realistically you wouldn't want him anyway, but yeah the asking price is clearly too rich for everyone or he'd have been traded by now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/16/2023 at 1:29 PM, LinvilleGorge said:

If we can land a legit vet and take another promising WR in the draft then I'll fell okay at WR. Seems pretty clear that it's not going to be a great unit next year outside of some shocking development by players currently on the roster landing a steal in the draft, or swinging a surprising deal for a vet but maybe they at least won't be awful.

 

Yea, people need to seriously get prepared for a ground and pound/dunk to Sanders type offense with a tight playbook barring something crazy. And by prepared I mean low expectations.I expect a WR FA splash next season or the rookie this year to get better. Drafted WRs usually take a while. And unless TMJ breaks out we need a 1 and a 2…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's not an nfl issue it's an owner issue. The owners put pressure on the coaches to play them before they are ready. Very few if any have a vet to sit behind for at least a year to learn and adjust to the game. The Panthers would benefit from having a serviceable veteran that would allow them to sit their next rookie. Had they done that last season maybe things would look different. 
    • My dude, why do you keep doing things like this?  I don't take joy in questioning anyone else's intelligence or reading comprehension skills, but you keep doing things like things, and I can't let such asinine responses go without calling them out, it's just not in me to do that. LITERALLY in the very first sentence of the post you quoted, I straight up acknowledge and accept that you would take the QB there if you can't trade down, which in turn, is an acknowledgement of how you view them as an elite prospect. Period. There is no debating that, I literally right there in the first sentence did EXACTLY what you are claiming here that I can't do.   BEYOND any of that, you're still completely ignoring my question to you, which is a completely valid question in a discussion such as this right now, let's recap shall we........ The generic question is what to do with the #1 pick.  It's near unanimous that we use it to trade down, great, since we all agree, we can move past it in regards to the current discussion, as it's a hypothetical that requires another team's help to happen.   So we move onto the question of what we would do with the #1 pick if we have to make the selection there, great, simple, easy peasy, on the same page still. You have said you'd take a QB, I disagree, but numerous times have acknowledge you and some others feel that way (even though you bafflingly thing I haven't, disagreeing with someone isn't refusing to acknowledge their view). In the last 28 years the only positions to go #1 overall have been QB, DE, and OT.  I've clearly explained why I don't see any of those positions making sense for the Panthers, in our current state, to take in this draft, with this draft class.  Because of that, you still have to make a selection, you don't get to pass on making a pick. So I said I would take T-Mac with a full explanation (numerous times) as to why I view him as the prospect to take compared to the other options.  To which you deride and question my football intelligence solely for saying I'd take a WR #1 overall when you don't have a QB. I then ask you a simple question, which you refuse to answer solely on the basis of you saying you'd go with the QB.  You can't attack someone for saying they'd take a WR there and then refuse to answer the question of who you would take instead if you couldn't take a QB. Because there is a very real possibility that the Panthers will look at the QB's and agree with me (and many others) that there isn't a QB that is worth the risk taking at #1 overall and they end up unable to trade back and have to make a pick there and won't go with a QB because of their grades on this class.   Which again, is my question to you, in THAT scenario, who are you drafting 1st overall if it's not a QB? It's a simple question, and answering it doesn't mean you don't believe in the QB's at that spot in the slightest, or even that I'm not accepting of your views on the QB's in this class.  
    • It is primarily the fault of the NFL who chooses to use college football as a minor league.
×
×
  • Create New...