Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers sign Bengals TE Hayden Hurst


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

Better than Tremble and Thomas combined. Although that's not saying much. 

Yeah.  He's good [enough] that if a starting caliber TE doesn't happen in the draft, not a huge deal.  But still allows us to select Musgrave/LaPorta/Washington at 39 if we choose.  

But then, if we don't, can still take a R4ish shot on a Schoonmaker, Kraft, Whyle type.  

Makes the decision at 39 less forced, can be the best offensive skill player available.  

Edited by Bear Hands
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Solid vet TE. I still expect TE to very much be in play at #39. Feels like that pick almost has to be WR or TE unless someone is there that's just shocking to still be available.

5 tech that fell?  MLB?

I'm with you, but I'd prefer a wide out to a TE.  With TE's I'd rather do exactly what we did.  Just takes too long for those guys to contribute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

regarding Hopkins... Only 8 Mil?!? LET'S GO GET HIS ASS - From Bleacher Report:

Hopkins has a no-trade clause in his contract and is set to carry a $30.8 million cap hit in 2023. That cap hit will be reduced to $8.2 million after Arizona takes on the $22.6 million in dead money remaining on his deal—but he won't be a fit for every team. He'll have to sign off on any trade, and teams will either need to have the necessary cap space or be willing to negotiate a new long-term deal.

Edited by Mistuh Jones
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Mistuh Jones said:

regarding Hopkins... Only 8 Mil?!? LET'S GO GET HIS ASS - From Bleacher Report:

Hopkins has a no-trade clause in his contract and is set to carry a $30.8 million cap hit in 2023. That cap hit will be reduced to $8.2 million after Arizona takes on the $22.6 million in dead money remaining on his deal—but he won't be a fit for every team. He'll have to sign off on any trade, and teams will either need to have the necessary cap space or be willing to negotiate a new long-term deal.

I thought I read that his no trade clause was void because of the PED thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mbarbour21 said:

Draft is starting to look more open for us now. I doubt we will need to reach for anything. That’s what you want.

Offensive weapons…I mean Hurst is ok but he doesn’t change that or even close. This franchise will doom our new QB if they don’t get him a WR. It’s going to be bad, really bad. 

That’s said it’s really the only major need with oline depth and LB next. I wouldn’t be mad if Fit moved up back into the first for someone. Even then we need vets.

Edited by onmyown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

Cut or trade Ian Thomas would save $3M, which would probably cover the cost of this signing. 

No, it wouldn't.  Thomas is 5 million in dead cap.  We only net about 1.5 million by getting rid of him.  Next offseason, it looks better with only 1.5 million of dead cap against a 7 million cap number.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...