Which of these FA WRs would you want to go after?

[Riverboat Ron]

21 hours ago, StealthCat said:

Paris Campbell has already played in and had some success in Reich's system even with bad QB play.

Definitely an underrated WR, watched a lot of Colts fantasy for Michael Pittman, Campbell was arguably the best option.

[L-TownCat]

3 hours ago, Sub Zero said:

Woods signed with somebody else already but I agree.. Add a Vet at WR maybe 2.. Get A TE in this deep draft and let’s gooooo!!

I missed that somehow.  Oh Well.

[CPF4LIFE]

Im all for signing a Vet TE over a Rookie TE to pair with a Rookie QB. 

[RockyTopVol]

Ted Ginn Jr.

[KillerKat]

Get Theilen and Hopkins. fug it.

[LinvilleGorge]

12 hours ago, Carl Spackler said:

 Stroud strikes me as a Burrow-tier player

I sure hope so. If we get a Burrow-tier QB out of this deal then it was a great trade. But now we need receivers.

[rebelrouser]

Lazzard, Chark, or Campbell if we can get them at around 10m. Schultz or Gesicki at TE. That opens up our draft quite a bit. We can go best available edge, lb, wr, or te (maybe not even take one but its a really good class).  

[Matthias]

I wouldn't trade for a receiver.  For me, we need to save what ammo we can in order to move up and get Marvin Harrison next year.  I'm willing to sell all the marbles to get him.

[Panthering]

Good god. How about we never speak of that list ever again. 

[ForJimmy]

1 hour ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

We win this division if this happens.

 

Stroud the next big thing. People better start buying the hype. We got something special brewing!

If it is Stroud, that's my next jersey and for the record the only other one I have is Cam.  

[Matthias]

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

You guys live in fantasy land.

Why would other teams trade can't miss prospects?

 

If these guys are what you think they are those teams will select them. Caleb/Maye/Harrison will be the top 3 picks next year.

We would have to trade up into the top three then. 

[Carl Spackler]

14 hours ago, therealmjl said:

Sidenote: the trade was never going to happen without Moore being included. The Bears pushed for this.

I'm aware of that. Sometimes the smart thing is to back away, instead of cowering to every demand. There's also a great possibility that the player picked at No. 1 would still be available at 2 or 3. Perhaps as late as 9.

[Carl Spackler]

14 hours ago, csx said:

It sounds like you formed a very strong opinion but did not read any of the contextual information regarding the trade. 

I read every fuging word. Try again. 

Just because a team demands something, doesn't mean you have to cowtow to that demand. That's what stupid GMs do. Hurney got flamed for it but somehow, now, it's OK to give away all your good players, because somehow that's the way you win.

[ForJimmy]

Just now, Carl Spackler said:

I'm aware of that. Sometimes the smart thing is to back away, instead of cowering to every demand. There's also a great possibility that the player picked at No. 1 would still be available at 2 or 3. Perhaps as late as 9.

We’ve had Moore for years with nothing to show. Even the best WRs need a QB to get them the ball regularly.