Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who's your 3-4?


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

  On 3/12/2023 at 12:33 PM, MHS831 said:

I think we will sign a WR in free agency, but the rest of the $$$ will go to find 2-3 free agents--a NT, S (depending on Chinn's involvement) and maybe CB (remember what Brady did to us, and we can count on Action Jackson for about a half season).  I think Shaq and Luvu will be the inside LBs.

 

 

Expand  

I’m wanting Bozeman and one of the top TEs available in FA plus at WR like Hyatt/Downs at 39. I think our OL would be set (starters at least) adding Schultz/Gesicki and our rookie WR will help offset the loss of DJ Moore. Grab a mid round RB and our offense should be capable. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/12/2023 at 12:33 PM, MHS831 said:

I think we will sign a WR in free agency, but the rest of the $$$ will go to find 2-3 free agents--a NT, S (depending on Chinn's involvement) and maybe CB (remember what Brady did to us, and we can count on Action Jackson for about a half season).  I think Shaq and Luvu will be the inside LBs.

 

 

Expand  

I think we need to move Chinn for a player or draft capital.  He seems like a man without a country in the new 3-4, cover 2.  What a shame.  Any team come to mind that needs a good Kam Chancelor type SS?

Edited by bythenbrs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/12/2023 at 1:07 PM, bythenbrs said:

Where's YGM?  I'm afraid you're going to say 'bench' but, it is what it is...

Expand  

Rotational? Honestly, he's been not a disappointment but more of a "meh" player. Maybe he comes alive in the new scheme, maybe he doesn't.

I think we kept a lot of bubble players because Rhule thought they either fit his culture or were just about ready to drink his Kool-Ade. Still, in YGM's case, he hasn't been that expensive and he has been uninjured and available... if you're that kind of guy and get lucky, you can have a decent NFL career. There are 10  year vets that rarely touch a starting lineup but they hang on because they are okay, healthy, quiet and inexpensive.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If YGM is used on the front of a 3-4 line we are doomed. He will get eaten alive. 
 

Best way I see it if you’re actually going to compete:

DE: Resign Anderson or Ioannidis maybe John Cominsky if available. 

NT: Free Agent

DE: Brown

Edge: Luvu

ILB: Thompson

ILB: Draft a guy like Campbell or Eichenburg/Maybe sign a guy like Edmunds but doubt we have the cap.

Edge: Burns

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OLB- Burns, Chinn (Haynes, Barno)

ILB- Shaq, Luvu, (Smith)

NT- FA, draft pick, (McCall)

DE- Brown, FA, YGM, draft pick

CB- Jackson, Henderson

CB-Horn, Taylor

SS-Woods, (re-sign Burris Or Franklin cheap)

FS- FA, (draft pick)

Nickle- FA

Chinn is going to have to add some weight, but I think he will do better on the outside than inside.  He can drop in coverage and also see him doing better against OTs/TEs than the interior guys.  I don't agree with trading him, he's too good of a player.  We have the staff to find him a home and max out his potential.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The team ran lots of 3-4 looks over the last few years. Phil snow was a multi front guy. Last year alone Burns was more a stand up rusher then most seem to remember. 

So base off what they have played before I would say:

 

olb- draft pick/Haynes/Barno

Ilb- Luvu  

Ilb- Thompson 

Olb- Burns 

De- YGM

De- Brown 

Nt- draft pick/ McCall

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/12/2023 at 12:42 PM, ForJimmy said:

I’m wanting Bozeman and one of the top TEs available in FA plus at WR like Hyatt/Downs at 39. I think our OL would be set (starters at least) adding Schultz/Gesicki and our rookie WR will help offset the loss of DJ Moore. Grab a mid round RB and our offense should be capable. 

Expand  

Probably the best case scenario…would be nice

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • These are the three deep throw attempts that Will Levis made in week 12. His first one is a beauty; Levis and Westbrook-Ikhine gets the safety to bite on a deep dig only to go over the top for the score. His second throw is another beauty: a crosser to Calvin Ridley reminiscent of Bryce to XL (though Ridley has noticeably more separation on his route). His third and final deep shot was an incompletion from his own endzone on 3rd & 14 with pressure coming down on him (to me, this seems like a solid throw).   Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-02.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Levis took half of the deep shots that Young did. The differences are: Ridley had much better separation than XL, which is why his deep crosser turned into a 63yd play since he was able to scamper for another 15+ after the catch. Westbrook-Ikhine holds on to his TD pass. Bryce had to throw one away to preserve time for a field goal. Bryce had two more throws that were incomplete due to the WR Are we really holding the three WR errors and clock management decision against Bryce in order to say that Will was better throwing deep in week 12? That's not passing the eye test nor is it confirmed by the data.
    • If you go on the PUP list before the season starts, you are gone for the year. If you start the year on the PUP list then you can get off of it. Kind of semantics, but we are putting him on the PUP list now which is before week 1, that’s why people who come off of it aren’t really on the PUP list until week 1, hence you usually hear right before the season that they are “starting the year” on the PUP list. I think PUP list and IR may basically be the serve the same purpose now because you also sometimes hear that if a player is added to the IR before week 1 that they aren’t eligible to come off the IR list for the entire year. Now, everyone added to IR (post week 1) can come off after 4 (or more) games so the PUP list is meaningless since it’s 6 games and starts at week 1. Anyone added to PUP or IR in the preseason is gone for the year.
    • I saw Brooks maybe a few weeks ago, he was walking pretty normally. of course he wasnt running, jumping and cutting.
×
×
  • Create New...