would you trade jonathan stewart...

[The Faceless]

Although not necessarily relevant to the topic at hand, I think Moore would do good if he had someone else to throw to besides Smith and Rosario, and a chance to develop chemistry with our 1st team offense.

[Fiz]

sam mills fan you are stupid as poo

troy smith is a midget from a poo conference that sucked in college

[Snake]

Hell no!!!!

[magnus]

absolutely not. Don't trade Stewart. Besides, you're giving up terrible value for a low cost high value player who's already successful here. Trading top 20 picks away is never a good sign, and that's because no one does it unless the player is a failure.

[OneBadassCat]

Stewart just showed he was a franchise back today. No way do you trade him. Personally I think its possible that if any back gets traded it will be Deangelo simply because:

1. Age

2. Will cost more than Jstew

3. Has alot of value

As much as I would hate to see any of our backs traded, shopping Deangelo is the logical choice.

[frash.exe]

Stewart just showed he was a franchise back today. No way do you trade him. Personally I think its possible that if any back gets traded it will be Deangelo simply because:

1. Age

2. Will cost more than Jstew

3. Has alot of value

As much as I would hate to see any of our backs traded, shopping Deangelo is the logical choice.

yes he showed he was really franchise back caliber just like when Fred Jackson rushed for 165 against the bucs and Ahmad Bradshaw ran for 104 and Ricky Williams for 102.

Williams is the catalyst for the running game. his vision is superior, he has more speed, he's more elusive, and he can hold his own as far as power goes. Just because Stewart can get a buck twenty against a poo defense does not mean he's a great back. He has terrible performances as often as he has good ones.

[PhillyB]

yes he showed he was really franchise back caliber just like when Fred Jackson rushed for 165 against the bucs and Ahmad Bradshaw ran for 104 and Ricky Williams for 102.

Williams is the catalyst for the running game. his vision is superior, he has more speed, he's more elusive, and he can hold his own as far as power goes. Just because Stewart can get a buck twenty against a poo defense does not mean he's a great back. He has terrible performances as often as he has good ones.

exactly. stewart is good BECAUSE of williams.

[kdrh5]

i thought it was the other way around? how about this....they are both good? maybe?

[OneBadassCat]

yes he showed he was really franchise back caliber just like when Fred Jackson rushed for 165 against the bucs and Ahmad Bradshaw ran for 104 and Ricky Williams for 102.

Williams is the catalyst for the running game. his vision is superior, he has more speed, he's more elusive, and he can hold his own as far as power goes. Just because Stewart can get a buck twenty against a poo defense does not mean he's a great back. He has terrible performances as often as he has good ones.

Well I'm gonna call bullshit on this. Stewart would easily start on other teams. I think Deangelo is the better back. But if one is going to get traded I'd be willing to bet it's Deangelo. We have arguably the deepest back field in the league.

[frash.exe]

absolutely not. Don't trade Stewart. Besides, you're giving up terrible value for a low cost high value player who's already successful here. Trading top 20 picks away is never a good sign, and that's because no one does it unless the player is a failure.

funny you should say that because the last time the redskins sanctioned a high-profile trade for a RB it was Champ Bailey and a second rounder

i mean if the redskins approached us with this kind of a trade and we had nothing else to reference we should go for it anyway because you know Vinny Cerrato has no fuging idea what he's doing

[frash.exe]

Well I'm gonna call bullshit on this. Stewart would easily start on other teams. I think Deangelo is the better back. But if one is going to get traded I'd be willing to bet it's Deangelo. We have arguably the deepest back field in the league.

yea but you don't have to be great to start at running back for a lot of teams

Stewart is just good and that's as far as he goes.

[Fiz]

i don't know how good stewart is but he's not as good as deangelo

let me just put this another way, what's more valuable

jonathan stewart as a backup and tyrell sutton as the third string v. a 2nd rounder (plus a player of need) and sutton as the 2nd string

[beastson]

Hold up there, Campbell did absolutely nothing wrong in that game. Suisham and Sellers lost the 'Skins that game. Don't put that on Campbell. 30/42 367 yds 3 tds 1 Pic, that happened basically at the end of Regulation. Phenomenal Game.

It wasnt. They had good field position and coulda won. He threw a pick and wasn't even looking in the way he threw it. Idk if Jake woulda did that

And on top of it all, he hasn't been that good this year

[Fiz]

all of you seem to be little children when it comes to the idea of trading away players we drafted/not starting players we drafted

buh buh buh dan conner is gonna retwire a panfer we can't wet him sit behind diggs abloo bloo bloo