Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Breaking: Lamar Jackson is available as Raven's have placed the non-exclusive franchise tag on him.


thunderraiden
 Share

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

And here's your first problem

The topic is also on this board my man.

 

Why is it such a big topic if that isn't the case?

 

We all trying to figure out why nobody is interested in a franchise QB in his prime. Nobody is offering a contract...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

The topic is also on this board my man.

 

Why is it such a big topic if that isn't the case?

 

We all trying to figure out why nobody is interested in a franchise QB in his prime. Nobody is offering a contract...

It has been explained to you multiple times but you ignore it. He will cost 2 first round picks, he wants a huge guaranteed contract, he has been injury prone the last two years, he has his mommy trying to negotiate on his behalf, it really isn't that hard to see why teams would not make a move for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

No team is even offering him a contract as of yet.

Somebody said he can't even talk to teams until a week from now.

A lot of conflicting reports so far.

I ask you this how is a QB with a MVP on his resume and a QB who wins 75% of his games not even get a team to offer him a contract?

Deshaun Watson had the entire league after him with his off field issues.

If you think those situations have nothing to do with each other so be it.

Im like the players on this one "how is this guy not even getting a offer".

We've had this discussion.

It's not as simple as saying "He's really good, let's go get him." There are a hundred other real world details that you have to factor into the discussion.

This isn't Madden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We'd be crazy not to at least talk about it. Do I think we'll actually do it? No.

Yep and we will end up signing a lesser QB.

 

Cycle of bad decisions continue for Tepper. When a franchise QB is available is when he actually chooses to pass on them. Rodgers and Lamar are both available and he's like nah im good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Panthera onca said:

It has been explained to you multiple times but you ignore it. He will cost 2 first round picks, he wants a huge guaranteed contract, he has been injury prone the last two years, he has his mommy trying to negotiate on his behalf, it really isn't that hard to see why teams would not make a move for him.

You keep ignoring it.


When you have a MVP on your resume and you win 75% of your games as a starter this is the type of price you pay for a franchise QB. 

 

Look around the league for goodness sake what QB isn't overpaid?

 

Tepper is making some questionable decisions when it comes to the QB. We know the obvious Darnold/Mayfield/Bridgewater but the dude went after Deshaun freaking Watson!

 

How do you have interest in Watson but pass on Lamar who is a better QB and has no off field issues. This franchise has gone downhill since he owned it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

We've had this discussion.

It's not as simple as saying "He's really good, let's go get him." There are a hundred other real world details that you have to factor into the discussion.

This isn't Madden.

I notice the simple thing to do is go for bridge QB's.

 

Tell me how that has worked out?

 

Luckily Tepper was cheap and didn't want to pay up for Carr that would have been another bad decision.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im done defending Lamar people only believe what they want. I tried to sell people on why we should at least offer him a fair contract. I see that's going in one ear and out the other. So no need for me to keep getting burnt out saying the same thing over and over.

 

RIP CamWhoaaCam Lamar debate.

 

Yall can go at it from here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Man whether it's the Panthers or the Hornets it's crazy how many foolish talking heads there are in the local media. I just unsubscribed from locked on Hornets. Doug Branson with his cheesy mustache is an absolute clown especially when his partner isn't on. Talking about trading LaMelo because he can't win basketball games by himself with no semblance whatsoever of a legitimate Center. These YouTube personalities will say anything for a damn click.
    • I’m hoping for that exact same scenario, two seconds would be big for us. I’d hope for 3 impact players. A WR/DL/DE that can contribute like this current class would be key to our rebuild.
    • When I look at what I can find, a carryover problem from last season is our receivers are still unable to get enough separation on a consistent basis. Canales is certainly better at scheming them open, like how he sneaked out Thielen for a big play. But then he's also having Thielen running routes he frankly shouldn't be doing anymore. I feel part of the RZ issues is not really having anyone - after trading Diontae - who can make those quick cuts on a short field to give whoever is under center a wider window to throw. We also only have one guy with blazing speed in Thompkins and from what I could see, he's really used more to draw away coverage. I bring this all up because what Canales needs for sustained success - other than QB - is the other receiver pieces we'll be getting in the offseason.  Otherwise, I have to say that Canales isn't as afraid to be aggressive offensively. As others mentioned, still doesn't run the ball enough at times. Finally, I still feel his playcalls still doesn't line up with his mantra of getting rid of the ball within x amount of seconds. Maybe I count too slow. Oh, and I'm glad Canales first game after a bye looked good. I feared he'd be like Ron Rivera where we would fall flat on our faces.
×
×
  • Create New...