Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Ravens can’t be this dumb? They’re a smart organization right?

TheBigKat

By TheBigKat,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Falcons might be all over that....

That would be a good bet.

1 minute ago, Mage said:

I like Stephen A, but I'll trust the reporting we have heard over the last 6 or however many months over him.  He's more connected to the NBA than the NFL.

Not saying he's wrong.  Him/his source could be right! But until other sources chime in saying the same thing, then my belief is that Jackson is searching for a contract in the same vein as Watson's.

Plus, no high-end QB has signed a long-term extension since then right?  It makes sense as to why he would expect that.

Jackson arguably deserves a contract akin to Watson's. I believe that someone will likely offer him 230-240 guaranteed also with more years on top that are essentially voidable. But we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Falcons might be all over that....

This seems to be his destination. It sucks because I think they would be a threat to us. 

 

Lamar with a TE like Pitts would be a nightmare.

 

I hope there is a sleeper team in the NFC that might be after him. A team like Washington could be lurking.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The idea of Steven A being right and pretty much everybody else being wrong is a little too farfetched for me.

Every NFL player "wants" a fully guaranteed contract, but that doesn't mean that Jackson's camp actually "asked" for or "demanded" one.  

It has been reported that the Ravens offered him $133 bil fully guaranteed. That's not going to fly, and I don't blame Jackson for getting as much as he can.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
Just now, top dawg said:

Every NFL player "wants" a fully guaranteed contract, but that doesn't mean that Jackson's camp actually "asked" for or "demanded" one.  

It has been reported that tje Ravens offered him $133 bil fully guaranteed. That's not going to fly, and I don't blame Jackson for getting as much as he can.

Dude, even the NFLPA pretty much confirmed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
Just now, top dawg said:

"Pretty much" confirming and confirming something without question are not exactly the same thing, at all.

Believing what the evidence tells you and believing what you want to believe aren't the same thing either.

Between the NFLPA encouraging Jackson to stick to his guns with regard to a fully guaranteed contract and pretty much every source outside of Steven A Smith confirming that's what he wants, If you still think that's not what he's asking for, you're wearing blinders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toker Smurf Experienced

Toker Smurf

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

You are the only source. I never seen a guy who thinks he knows more than actual insiders.lol

 

Never change my man.

That is exactly the point. Steven A is not an insider. He even said so himself, that he is not refuting the others who have covered it, he's just echoing what he was told by Lamar's camp. People can be very clever with wording. The truth is usually somewhere in between. Maybe he isn't demanding a fully guaranteed contract but a guaranteed amount, greater than Watson's guaranteed amount, would be my guess, regardless of a non guaranteed amount beyond that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Believing what the evidence tells you and believing what you want to believe aren't the same thing either.

Between the NFLPA encouraging Jackson to stick to his guns with regard to a fully guaranteed contract and pretty much every source outside of Steven A Smith confirming that's what he wants, If you still think that's not what he's asking for, you're wearing blinders.

Of course the NFLPA wants him to get a fully guaranteed contract. That's like the holy grail for NFL players. The Browns opened Pandora's box, and now most of the owners are tryinng to close it back.I think all their contracts should be guaranteed. So if he did good on him. But words do matter, and it's not like we have seen anything definitive.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

If you think there are no other sources reporting that Jackson wants a fully guaranteed contract, well... 😆

Im not talking about just this report. You act like your source is the only source that matters on all topics.

 

Then when somebody post a source saying something totally opposite you try to find a source that says something different.

 

Rumors are floating around heavy around this time of year. We don't know who to trust. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • mav1234
      Gameday Thread: KC-CAR

      By mav1234 · Posted

      KC has a very good defense this year. It is 5th overall. Yes, still worse than last year, but their offense is considerably worse. Their passing D may be their "weakness" but they still allow fewer than 20 ppg. BY completed several deep passes yesterday, and he was able to threaten downfield in ways he didn't seem capable of before the benching. I'm not necessarily worried about his ability to connect deep anymore. What to me was impressive was that he did all this without a run game. We used the pass to set up what little running success we had. Wild.
    • Bear Hands
      Bryce developing before our eyes

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      Solid and fair assessment.   I will say, one of the big things I noticed yesterday was that he wasn't shy to step up into the pocket in the face of pressure.  He's trusting the IOL.  And they took care of Chris Jones yesterday.  We had clean pockets but also good success rate vs. pressure which just hasn't been the case with Bryce.   If he has more confidence the OL gets it done and he can navigate and step up for throws, that's huge.  It's one of the biggest things that's held him back.  He was previously bailing quickly and just too easily throwing away or making dead plays.     He was finding his 2nd to 3rd reads within structure/without bailing in the pocket.  That was nice to see, as much concern I have with him.  And the overall limitations will always be there. Time to back it up this week against the Bucs.  
    • 45catfan
      Some Thoughts on Our Remaining Games

      By 45catfan · Posted

      Suddenly the Cowgirls look like our best chance for a win remaining. I think the Bucs are playing better than the Falcons of late.  Our lone game versus the dirty birds is in the ATL where we always struggle.  The Cardinals are marginally better than I thought they would be. We are not beating the Eagles, they are starting to roll. I'm saying two at most, next week at home versus the Bucs and the Cowgirls.
×
×
  • Create New...